IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH PORT BLAIR
CHITTA RANJAN DASH, MD. NIZAMUDDIN, JJ.
Liton Baroi and Others – Petitioners
Versus
The Union of India and Others – Respondents
WPCT No. 26 of 2022
Decided On : 24-02-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 14, 16, 226, 227, 309 – Post of Primary School Teachers – Appointment – Procedure to be followed – Provisional selected list – Whether cerates any right - Held, provisional select list does not vest any right on any candidate to claim appointment – At same time, when there are large number of vacancies and provisional select list, according to the press release of respondents (as discussed supra) has been prepared in “free, fair, transparent and objective manner”, a legitimate expectation arise in each candidate who has found place in provisional select list to be appointed – Merely because word “provisional” is there before “select list”, it is not actually provisional so far as selection is concerned – It is provisional only to the extent that candidates whose names are there in provisional select list, are entitled to be appointed or posted, after they are found to be genuine and suitable, on verification of their documents etc., within parameter of extant rules – Disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
CHITTA RANJAN DASH, J.
1. A common judgment passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, Kolkata on 10th May, 2022 in four sets of applications, being OA No. 95 of 2019, OA No. 120 of 2019, OA No. 1570 of 2019 and OA No. 1385 of 2020 is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. It is pertinent to mention here that aforesaid three original applications of 2019 were filed by one set of advocates and the fourth original application of 2020 was filed by another set of advocates.
3. In the present writ petition, 52 petitioners, whose names are there in the provisional select list for the post of Primary School Teachers (PSTs for short), are the petitioners.
4. A compendium of facts relevant for disposal of the writ petition is as follows:
(b) The selection was conducted through self – assessment recorded by aspiring candidates in accordance with the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands Administration, Primary School Teacher Recruitment (Amendment ) Rules, 2016 (2016 RR for short).
(c) It is pertinent to mention here that the original Recruitment Rule was notified in 2011 and the same had suffered some peripheral amendments before the present 2016 RR came into force. Notification dated 16th July, 2018 inviting applications for filling up the posts was also published in accordance with 2016 RR.
(d) After due exercise in accordance with 2016 RR, provisional select list was published on 17th December, 2018. After publication of the provisional select list, around 210 representations were received from aspiring candidates (who were not selected) to re-verify the documents as well as marks.
(e) We feel persuaded to mention here that all the representations had been received from the unsuccessful candidates, after a press release by the respondents inviting representations. On the basis of the representations received, a two member committee consisting of one S.C. Rao, Head Master and a teacher namely Smt Geeta Navin Bhatt, was constituted to look into the representations received from unsuccessful candidates.
(f) Said Committee, after examination of the representations, in their report, concluded as follows:
“(a) Knowledge of Hindi
Recommendations:
There is no separate certificate for knowledge of Hindi (as per Clause 2) may be insisted for applicants who have studied in the Islands school. But the Directorate may issue specific templates for Hindi Knowledge Certificate for students who studied in mainland.
(b) Medium of Instruction
Recommendations:
A Press Note may be issued by the Department informing the applicants to submit their Medium of Certificate in standard format (which will be published on the department website and in the “The Daily Telegrams” for information of general public) and for knowledge of Hindi (as per Clause 2 of Essential Qualification) for those applicants who have studied in mainland as stated in, Issue No. (a). These certificates will be received at designated officers of the Department of Education within a period of 14 Says from the date of issue of the Press Note.
The Scrutiny Team shall consider these certificates so being submitted and will draw a fresh provisional list based upon the new set of facts (if any).
(c) Recruitment Rule Provisions
Recommendations:
Department may also take considered view to allow the candidates who have studied in the bilingual medium and to consider the candidature of B. Ed qualified candidates (since the current scrutiny committee has rejected B. Ed. Qualified candidates as per the extant RR) for the post of PST”.
(g) After the Committee report, respondents vide press note dated 11th January, 2019 (Annexure P-3 to the original application), cancelled the provisional select list oblig
Ahmedabad Manufacturing & Calico Ptg. Co. Ltd. vs. Ram Tahel Ramnand
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram
Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd. v. Sukumar Mukherjee
Dhananjay Malik and Others vs. State of Uttaranchal and Others
Dinesh Kumar Kashyap and Others vs. South Central Railway and Others
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Ahmad Ishaque
Jijabai Vithalrao Gajre vs. Pathankhan
K. Kuppusamy and Another vs. State of T.N. and Others
Laxmikant Revchand Bhojwani and Another vs. Pratapsingh Mohansingh Pardeshi
Lonand Grampanchayat vs. Ramgiri Gosavi
Mani Nariman Daruwala and Others vs. Phiroz N. Bhatena and Others
Nagendra Nath Bora vs. Commr. of Hills Division and Appeals
Sanjay K. Dixit and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Shalini Shyam Shetty and Another vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil
State of Gujarat vs. Vakhatsinghji Vajesinghji Vaghela AIR 1968 SC 1481
Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai
T. Kannan and Others vs. S. K. Nayyar and Others (1991) 1 SCC 544
The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 does not permit the High Court to interfere unless there is a manifest error, breach of legal principles, or failure of justice in the tribunal's decisi....
Public employment recruitment must adhere to fairness and transparency principles; systemic irregularities justify cancellation of selection processes. No vested rights exist without appointment lett....
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot replace the tribunal's findings unless there is manifest error or injustice.
Parity – When there is a declaration of law by court, Judgment can be treated as Judgment in rem and require equities to be balanced by treating those similarly situated, similarly.
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot challenge the process or regulations post-selection, establishing a principle of acquiescence in recruitment law.
[Judicial review is concerned with the legality of the decision-making process rather than the merits of the decision itself. The court emphasized the importance of timely challenges to administrativ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.