IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI, JJ.
Vinay Dubey S/o Shri Late A.L. Dubey - Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPPIL No. 2 of 2021
Decided on : 12-05-2023
Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Section 82, 69, 70 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 243, 226 - Companies Act, 2013 - Section 2(27) - Smart Cities - Usurpation of powers and authorities - Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to quash order passed by respondent No. 1 constituting Bilaspur Smart City Co. Ltd. And Raipur Smart City Ltd. and in consequence thereof declare all actions taken in furtherance of order as null and void - Held, Grievance which appears to be hammered before Court is that elected members/ body of Municipal Corporation does not have effective participation or role in implementation of developmental activities carried on by SVPs as there is no elected member in Board of Directors of RSCL and BSCL - If respondents No. 4, 5, 6 and 7 or any other elected representatives were so conscious about alleged encroachment made in their field by SPVs, they ought to have opted for not implementing Scheme or could have challenged same as and when Scheme was launched in year - Scheme was allowed to continue peacefully till December 2020 when petition was filed and now when work of Smart City Project is about to reach its completion, such an objection is now being raised by petitioner and elected members of representatives of Municipal Corporations which appears to be collusive and with oblique motive between them which will stall projects which are for advancement and development of two major cities of State - PIL dismissed.
ORDER :
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. The petitioner, who is a practicing Advocate, claims himself to be a known social worker. He has filed the present petition in the representative capacity of the citizens of Bilaspur and Raipur Municipal Corporation seeking for the following reliefs:
“1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the formation and operation of the Bilaspur Smart City Limited and Raipur Smart City Limited.
2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to quash the order dated 17.08.2016 F-528/2-16/18, (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No. 1 constituting Bilaspur Smart City Co. Ltd. And Raipur Smart City Ltd. and in consequence thereof declare all the actions taken in furtherance of the order dated 17.08.2016 as null and void.
3. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to reconstitute the Board of Directors of the Bilaspur Smart City Limited and Raipur Smart City Limited in manner so that at least 50% of the members would come from elected members of the Nagar Palik Nigam Bilaspur and Raipur respectively.
4. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to make Mayor and Speaker as member of the Board of Directors of the Bilaspur Smart City Limited and Raipur Smart City Limited.
5. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the effect to take post facto approval of all the development works completed by the Bilaspur Smart City Limited and Raipur Smart City Limited since their inception from the concerned elected bodies of the Nagar Palik Nigam as per the prescribed procedure.
6. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the effect to constitute Ward Committee and Mohalla Samiti in Nagar Nigam of the State.
7. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the effect to frame rules for constitution, functions, powers and procedures for conduct of business of the Wards Committee.
8. That, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass any other order/relief that this Hon’ble Court may please deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including grant of cost of the instant litigation.”
2. Challenge in this petition is to the alleged usurpation of powers and authorities of Municipal Corporation Bilaspur and Raipur by the Smart Cities Limited i.e. the Bilaspur Smart City Limited (for short, the BSCL) and the Raipur Smart City Limited (for short, the RSCL) in contravention of the Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 as well as Article 243 of the Constitution of India as by the 74th amendment, Constitutional democracy was extended beyond the Parliament and Assembly to Panchayats and Municipalities. By introduction of Smart City Limited, the Special Purpose Vehicle Companies (for short, the SPV) has undermined the elected local bodies and have also usurped their powers and functions.
3. The facts, in brief, as projected by the petitioner are that the Government of India, Department of Housing and Urban Affairs, launched a Smart City Mission (for short, the SCM) to fund different selected cities for standard development. The said mission was to be implemented through SPVs. The respondent No. 1 incorporated BSCL and RSCL as SPVs in September, 2016 to carry out the development and maintenance work in the particular assigned areas of Bilaspur and Raipur Municipal Corporation. Some typical features of comprehensive development in Smart Cities are described as under:
(i) Promoting mixed land use in area- based development— planning for ‘unplanned areas’ containing a range of compatible activities and land uses close to one another in order to make land use more efficient.
Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India & Others
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B.S. Muddappa & Others
B.P.Singhal v. Union of India & Another
Dr. B. Singh v. Union of India & Others
Directorate of Film Festivals & Others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain & Others
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India & Another
Manohar Joshi v. State of Maharashtra and Others
State of Punjab & Others v. Ram Lubhaya Bagga & Others
Parisons Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. & Another v. Union of India & Others
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware v. State of Maharashtra & Others
Kesavananda Bharati & Ors vs State of Kerala case
State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal & Others
Sidhartha Sarawgi v. Board of Trustees For Port of Kolkata & Others
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India & Others, AIR 2000 SC 3751 (paras 78, 255, 256
gpt-4
Delegation of municipal powers to smart city SPVs is valid, and the absence of elected representatives on their boards does not constitute usurpation of authority.
Gram panchayat - Recommendation of specification of village - Petitioner gram panchayats are not entitled to an opportunity of hearing, it cannot be said that no effective consultation was made by re....
The court upheld the validity of Section 19-B of the Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, determining it complies with constitutional requirements and does not confer arbitrary power on the state.
The court emphasized the need for accountability in public contracts, allowing judicial review to ensure fairness and public interest, while directing a CBI inquiry into irregularities in the Sports ....
Non-conduct of municipal elections for over seven years constitutes a violation of constitutional duties and governance principles, warranting a writ of mandamus to uphold democratic processes.
A multinational company cannot be classified as an 'instrumentality of the State' under Article 12 without pervasive control or public duty imposed by the State.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.