SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Montreaux Resorts P. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sonia Khosla – Respondent
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
1. Little did the framing fathers of the Constitution and the legislators visualize that the privilege and liberty granted to an individual to approach the court of law and to appear for himself and for others either as an attorney or as an advocate could and would be misused and abused to such an extent as has been done by this one individual Mr. Deepak Khosla.
2. 32 learned Judges of this High Court (including former and sitting judges), judges of the subordinate courts, the Company Law Board and the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of former judges of this Court and a former judge of the Supreme Court have recused themselves since 2008 from hearing the cases in which either Mr. Deepak Khosla is a party or appearing as an attorney or as an advocate.
3. Various judicial orders imposing costs and even initiating contempt proceedings both civil and criminal have not deterred him from continuing with his conduct.
4. The Courts in India are perceived as temples of justice and the Judges as its priests. The legal profession is considered world over as a very honourab
Andre Paul Terence Ambard v. Attorney General of Trinidad [AIR 1936 PC 141 : 1936 All LJ 671]
Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court [(1974) 1 SCC 374 : 1974 SCC (Cri) 128]
Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of U.P. [AIR 1954 SC 10 : 1954 Cri LJ 238]
Chetak Construction Ltd. v. Om Prakash [(1998) 4 SCC 577]
C.K. Daphtary v. O.P. Gupta[(1971) 1 SCC 626 : 1971 SCC (Cri) 286 : AIR 1971 SC 1132]
D.C. Saxena (Dr.) v. Chief Justice of India [(1996) 5 SCC 216]
Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India [(2003) 2 SCC 45]
Haridas Das v. Usha Rani Banik [(2007) 14 SCC 1 : (2009) 1 SCC (Cri) 750 : AIR 2007 SC 2688]
K.P. Tiwari v. State of M.P. [1994 Supp (1) SCC 540 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 712 : AIR 1994 SC 1031]
L.D. Jaikwal v. State of U.P. [(1984) 3 SCC 405 : 1984 SCC (Cri) 421 : AIR 1984 SC 1374
M.Y. Shareef v. Judges of Nagpur High Court [AIR 1955 SC 19 : 1955 Cri LJ 133 : (1955) 1 SCR 757]
NIRMALA J. JHALA V. STATE OF GUJARAT
O.P. SHARMA V. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra [AIR 1971 SC 221 : 1971 Cri LJ 268]
Radha Mohan Lal v. Rajasthan High Court[(2003) 3 SCC 427 : 2003 SCC (Cri) 863]
R.K. ANAND V. DELHI HIGH COURT
Rustom Cowasjee Cooper v. Union of India [(1970) 2 SCC 298 : AIR 1970 SC 1318] : (SCC p. 301
Shamsher Singh Bedi v. High Court of Punjab & Haryana [(1996) 7 SCC 99 : 1996 SCC (Cri) 181]
Supreme Court Bar Assn. vs. Union of India [(1998) 4 SCC 409 : JT (1998) 3 SC 184]
State of Bihar v. M.P. Khair Industries [(1980) 3 SCC 311 : 1980 SCC (Cri) 688]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.