Runeet Gulathi vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Del) 2142

MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Runeet Gulathi – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Maninder Singh, Adv., Smriti Asmita, Adv., Sarthak Garg, Adv., Aashaa Tiwari, Adv., Hrishikesh Baruah, Adv., Siddhant Kaushik, Adv., Ajay Kr Pipaniya, Adv., Pallavi Pipaniya, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J.

Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 15.09.2018 and order on sentence dated 19.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions case No. 52223/2016, in FIR No. 180/2012, registered under Sections 302/201/364/120B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act at Police Station Maurya Enclave, whereby the Learned Sessions Judge found the Appellants guilty and sentenced them as follows:

DD NO. 8A DATED 18.07.12 P.S. SUBZI MANDI, DISTT.

NORTH DELHI

Sanjeev Kapoor S/o Shadi Lal Kapoor

R/o 14, Gandhi Square, Malka Ganj

Delhi-110007

Information regarding

Missing and handing over

Time: 2.45 AM: At this time, it is entered that the person mentioned in Column No.2 came present at the Police Station and got recorded to the following effect: My son namely Shivam aged 20 years had left for an excursion at 9.30 PM in a usual manner by a Scooter No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Del) 2142

MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGALRuneet Gulathi – AppellantVersusState (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

Cases Referred (78)

MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Runeet Gulathi – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent