Gopal Krishan vs Vijay Kuamr Aggarwal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates appeared:
Mr Ram Bhakt Agrawal, Advocate, for Petitioner, Mr Rajesh Katyal, Advocate, for the Respondent

Table of Content
1. procedural context and background (Para 1 , 2)
2. argument on the relevancy of subsequent events (Para 3 , 4)
3. judicial scrutiny of subsequent events (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. support for taking subsequent events into account (Para 8)
5. counterarguments against considering subsequent events (Para 9)
6. judiciary's role and legislative rationale in eviction cases (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
7. dismissal of tenant’s applications and costs (Para 30)

JUDGMENT

Girish Kathpalia, J.

CM APPL. 1452/2024 (subsequent events) & CM APPL. 50183/2019 (subsequent events) in RC.REV. 160/2018

CM APPL. 1450/2024 (subsequent events) & CM APPL. 50184/2019 (subsequent events) in RC.REV. 180/2018

CM APPL. 1453/2024 (subsequent events) & CM APPL. 50113/2018 (additional documents) in RC.REV. 569/2018

CM APPL. 1455/2024 (subsequent events) & CM APPL. 50190/2018 (additional documents) in RC.REV. 570/2018

CM APPL. 1454/2024 (subsequent events) & CM APPL. 50195/2018 (subsequent events) in RC.REV. 571/2018

CM APPL. 1451/2024 (subsequent events) & CM APPL.50198/2018 (subsequent events) in RC.REV. 572/2018

1. These applications filed on behalf of the petitioners (tenants) in these petitions under proviso to Section 25B(