ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Prahladbhai Mafabhai Thakor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Though served, nobody appears for the respondents. The matter is of 2008 and accordingly, the Court proceeded with the same.
2. This appeal is filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the judgment and order dated 15.04.2008, passed in Special Case No. 15 of 2007 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dhrangadhra, recording the acquittal.
3. Facts in nutshell are that on 24.08.2007 at about 15:00 hours, when the complainant had gone to visit a fair at Chhatrod village and was standing, the respondent No. 4 – original accused No. 4 allegedly molested her and on hearing her shouts, her husband rushed there and scuffled took place between them. The respondents – accused allegedly beat up the husband of the complainant giving filthy abuses to the complainant and her husband and also insulted them of their caste in public and thus, the accused committed the offence punishable under Sections 354, 323, 504, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 (Atrocity Act) for which, FIR came to
Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar (1970) 2 SCC 450
Kuldeep Singh v. Commissioner of Police (1999) 2 SCC 10
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1963 SC 200
Narendra Singh v. State of M.P (2004) 10 SCC 699
Perla Somasekhara Reddy v. State of A.P (2009) 16 SCC 98
Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Admn (1984) 4 SCC 635
Ram Singh v. State of H.P (2010) 2 SCC 445)
Ramesh Babulal Doshi v. State of Gujarat (1996) 9 SCC 225
S. Rama Krishna v. S. Rami Reddy (2008) 5 SCC 535
Sambasivan v. State of Kerala (1998) 5 SCC 412
Shailendra Pratap v. State of U.P (2003) 1 SCC 761
Shambhoo Missir v. State of Bihar (1990) 4 SCC 17
Sheo Swarup v. King Emperor AIR 1934 PC 227
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran (2007) 3 SCC 755)
State of Rajasthan v. Naresh (2009) 9 SCC 368
State of U.P. v. Banne (2009) 4 SCC 271
State of U.P. v. Ram Veer Singh (2007) 13 SCC 102
Surajpal Singh v. State AIR 1952 SC 52
Tulsiram Kanu v. State AIR 1954 SC 1
Vijay Mohan Singh v. State of Karnataka
Wilayat Khan v. State of U.P AIR 1953 SC 122)
Aruvelu v. State (2009) 10 SCC 206
Atley v. State of U.P. AIR 1955 SC 807
Balak Ram v. State of U.P (1975) 3 SCC 219
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1957 SC 216
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P(2002) 4 SCC 85
Budh Singh v. State of U.P (2006) 9 SCC 731
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415
Dhanapal v. State (2009) 10 SCC 401
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao v. State of A.P (2009) 10 SCC 636)
Gaya Din v. Hanuman Prasad (2001) 1 SCC 501
Ghurey Lal v. State of U.P (2008) 10 SCC 450
K. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P. (1979) 1 SCC 355
K. Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala (1999) 3 SCC 309
The appellate court's power to review evidence in acquittal appeals is limited, and interference is justified only in exceptional cases with compelling circumstances and when the judgment under appea....
Point of law : It is true that the High Court would not reverse an order of acquittal merely on formation of an opinion different than that of the trial Court. It is also trite in law that the High C....
Point of Law : It is cardinal principle of criminal justice system that when there is satisfactory explanation for non-examination of independent witnesses, conviction can be based solely on the test....
It is settled law that if main grounds on which lower Court has based its order acquitting accused are reasonable and plausible, and same cannot be entirely and effectively be dislodged or demolished....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.