SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 389

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAKESH RAMKHILAVAN KEVAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR DIPESH D SONI(9996) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. learned app waives service (Para 1)
2. present application is filed (Para 2)
3. learned advocate appearing (Para 3)
4. learned app appearing (Para 4)
5. while granting bail (Para 5)
6. i have heard the learned advocates (Para 6)
7. in the facts and circumstances (Para 8 , 9 , 11)
8. bail bond to be executed (Para 10)
9. rule is made absolute (Para 12)

ORDER :

2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11210045234633 of 2023 registered with Pandesara Police Station, Surat, for the offence under Sections 302, 34, 120B, 201 and 115 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 135 of the G.P.Act.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that the present applicant is actively participated in the offence. He was part of the conspiracy, by hatching conspiracy, he caught hold the deceased at the spot and make arrangement for the snacks. Thereafter, co-accused viz. Santosh made as assault and at that time, present applicant along with the co-accused caught hold the deceased. Considering the aforesaid fact, it appears th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top