Back
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, KARDAK ETE
Mukul Deka – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the criminal case. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments against the prosecution's evidence and inconsistencies. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. allegations of uncorroborated hearsay evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. issues with witness reliability and investigative lapses. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. judicial observations on procedural importance. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. state's position and arguments in defense. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. supportive arguments from state's perspective. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. findings and reasoning behind the trial court's conviction. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 9. court's analysis and consider laws guiding evidence. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 10. final verdict and acquittal of the appellant. (Para 69 , 70) |
JUDGMENT :
Kardak Ete, J.
Heard Mr. N.N.B. Choudhury, learned counsel representing the appellant. Also heard Ms. S. Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Ms. Hira Baruah Barman was appointed as legal aid counsel for the respondent No. 2 vide order dated 02.09.2021. However, the learned legal aid counsel is absent.
2. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
