P. B. SURESH KUMAR, C. S. SUDHA
Korothmkandy Khalid S/o Moosa – Appellant
Versus
Sirajudheen P. S/o Assukutty – Respondent
ORDER :
C.S.Sudha, J.
These Rent Control Revision petitions (R.C.Rs.) under Section 20 of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (the Act) are filed by the petitioner-landlord against the common judgment dated 31/03/2014 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (RCAA), Thalassery, in R.C.A.No.159, 160, 161, 162, 165, 166, 167, 168, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 192 and 193/2010. Thirty five Rent Control Petitions (R.C.Ps.), namely, R.C.P.No.112, 122, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 131, 132, 133, 134, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 and 168/2006, were filed before the Rent Control Court (RCC), Thalassery, seeking eviction, mainly under Sections 11(3) and 11(4)(iv) of the Act. In R.C.P.No.123, 124, 127, 132, 133, 161 and 166 of 2006, the ground under Section 11(4) (iv) of the Act was also taken up. In R.C.P.No.123, 127, 132, 133, 161 and 166 of 2006, the ground under Section 11(4)(v) of the Act was also taken up. By a common order dated 27/02/2010, all the R.C.Ps. were dismissed. The petitioner-landlord filed the af
Nalakath Sainuddin v. Koorikadan Sulaiman
Sarla Ahuja v. United India Insurance Company Ltd.
Shiv Sarup Gupta v. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta
Ramniklal Pitambardas Mehta v. Indradaman Amratlal Sheth
D.A.V.College Trust and Management Society v. Director of Public Instructions
Krishna Menon v. District Judge
Joginder Pal v. Naval Kishore Behal
Right to property, though not a fundamental right is still a constitutional right. Article 300 A of the Constitution of India proclaims that no person can be deprived of his property save by authorit....
Point of law :Eviction of tenant - Bona fide need put forward by the landlord by itself is depending upon a contingency, namely, the final outcome of the civil suit mentioned above. Therefore in that....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing a bona fide need for eviction, the burden of proof on tenants, and the limitations of revisional jurisdiction under Section 20 of the Act.
Point of Law : Though the revisional power under Section 20 of the Act may be wider than Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 it cannot be equated even with the second appellate power con....
The landlord's bona fide need for eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act must be recognized, and courts should not dictate the suitability of premises for the landlord's int....
Eviction under Section 11(3) necessitates proving a genuine and bona fide need, distinct from mere whimsy, emphasizing the burden of proof on landlords.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a landlord's need for eviction under Section 11(3) of the Act must be bona fide, sincere, and honest, and not a mere pretext. The courts inter....
Landlords must prove bona fide need for eviction; tenants' failure to substantiate claims regarding income and available premises supports eviction orders under the Rent Control Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.