GANESH RAM MEENA
Ladu, S/o. Shri Juwara Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ganesh Ram Meena, J.
1. The present criminal appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellant against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 23.12.1993 passed by the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Malpura, Tonk, (Rajasthan) [for short ‘the trial Court’] in Sessions Case No.03/93, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
U/s. 363 IPC:
Three years Simple Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.300/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo one month simple imprisonment.
2. On filing of appeal, the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant was suspended vide order dated 20.01.1994 and he was released on bail.
3. Mr. Nitin Jain, learned counsel appearing for the accused appellant instead of arguing the appeal on its merits with regard to challenge to the conviction and sentence, confines his arguments for grant of benefit of probation to the appellant under the provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1958’). Counsel further submits that except the present case, no case has been registered against the accused-appellant. Counsel further submits that the accused-appellant is living peacefully i
Lakhvir Singh and Ors. Vs. The State of Punjab and Ors.
Ved Prakash vs. State of Haryana
State of Maharashtra vs. Jagmohan Singh Kuldip Singh Anand
Jagat Pal Singh & others vs. State of Haryana
Sitaram Paswan and Anr. v. State of Bihar
Smt. Devki Versus State of Harayana
State of Maharashtra Versus Natwar Lal Damodar Das Soni
The court reinforced that the Probation of Offenders Act prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment, allowing for probation based on the offender's character and circumstances.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC but granted probation, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment for offenders above 21 years.
The Probation of Offenders Act allows for probation for offenders not facing life sentences, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment based on individual circumstances.
The court established that probation can be granted under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, even for older offenders, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, based on the circumstances of the case, the na....
The court held that the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 applies to offenders above 21 years, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
Courts mandatorily consider probation for eligible offences under three years' imprisonment, recording reasons for denial; long pendency, no antecedents justify reformatory release over punishment.
Courts must consider probation for minor offences like voluntarily causing hurt, recording reasons if denied; appellate courts can grant benefit considering delay, offender character, reformatory aim....
The court emphasized the necessity for trial courts to consider the application of probation laws for first-time offenders and the requirement to provide reasons for not applying such provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.