GANESH RAM MEENA
Ram Naraian S/o Shri Kana Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ganesh Ram Meena, J.
1. The present criminal appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellant against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 27.11.1993 passed by the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sambhar Jheel, Jaipur, District Jaipur in Sessions Case No.13/1992, whereby, he has been convicted and sentenced for the offfence under section 307 IPC to seven years Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.
2. On filing of appeal, the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant was suspended vide order dated 15.12.1993 and he was released on bail.
3. Mr. Rinesh Gupta, Counsel assisted by Mr. Anoop Meena, appearing for the accused-appellant instead of arguing the appeal on its merits with regard to challenge to the conviction and sentence, confines his arguments for grant of benefit of probation to the appellant under the provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1958’). Counsel further submits that except the present case, no case has been registered against the accused-appellant. Counsel further submits that the accuse
Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Jagat Pal Singh & others vs. State of Haryana
Lakhvir Singh and Ors. Vs. The State of Punjab and Ors. (2021) 2 SCC 763
Mohd. Hashim v. State of U.P and Ors.
Mohd. Hashim Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab AIR 1965 SC 444
Sitaram Paswan and Anr v. State of Bihar
Smt. Devki Versus State of Harayana
State of Maharashtra Versus Natwar Lal Damodar Das Soni
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.