SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1234

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Kishori S. – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 359 of 2024
Decided On : 22-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Abhishek Aggarwal, Ashish Gehlot, T.C. Sharma
For the Respondents: Mukesh Trivedi, Kamla Goswami

Juveniles are entitled to bail under the Juvenile Justice Act unless exceptional circumstances exist, regardless of the offence's gravity.

Headnote:(A) Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section 12 - Bail for juvenile accused - The court emphasized that bail should be granted to juveniles irrespective of the nature of the offence unless exceptional circumstances exist - The petitioner, being a juvenile, was entitled to bail as no such circumstances were found. (Paras 7, 8, 9)

(B) The court noted that the gravity of the offence cannot be a ground to deny bail to a juvenile, reinforcing the protective intent of the legislation. (Paras 4, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a juvenile, was accused under the NDPS Act and had been denied bail by lower courts, which was contested on the grounds of her age and the nature of the evidence against her.

Findings of Court:
The court found no exceptional circumstances to deny bail and set aside the lower court's orders.

Issues: The main issue was whether the juvenile's release would pose a risk to her or the community, as per Section 12 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the legislative intent of the Juvenile Justice Act mandates bail for juveniles unless specific risks are identified, which were not present in this case.

Result: Revision petition allowed; bail granted.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile-through her legal guardian, maternal aunt Smt. Chandni) as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Section 08/21 of NDPS Act. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Act of 2015 before Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sriganganagar was rejected vide order dated 13.02.2024. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge (Juvenile Court), Sriganganagar in Criminal Appeal No. 20/2024 and the same has been dismissed by learned Appellate Court vide impugned order dated 20.02.2024.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 13.02.2024 and 20.02.2024 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is below 18 years of age and she has falsely been implicated in this case. The challan of the case has already been presented. He further submits that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Further there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail, then her release is likely to bring her into association with any known criminal, or expose her to moral, physical or psychological danger, or that her release would defeat the ends of justice. It is argued that learned Courts below have not appreciated the fact that the petitioner is juvenile and entitled to get benefit of provisions of the Act of 2015. Section 12 of the Act of 2015 clearly provides that if the accused is juvenile, then he should be released on bail, but learned Courts below fully ignored the provisions of the Act of 2015. The petitioner is in custody since long time and no further detention of the petitioner is required for any purpose. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the gravity of the offence committed cannot be a ground to decline bail to a juvenile.

5. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor defended the impugned order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board in declining the bail to the petitioner as also the judgment passed by the Appellate Court upholding the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board.

6. I have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the provisions of the Act of 2015.

7. The language of Section 12 of the Act of 2015 conveys the intention of the Legislature to grant bail to the juvenile, irrespective of nature or gravity of the offence, alleged to have been committed by her and bail can be denied only in the case where there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring her into association with any known criminal, or expose her to moral, physical or psychological danger, or that her release would defeat ends of justice.

8. In this context, I have also scanned through and perused the orders passed by the courts below. Having carefully examined provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act vis-a-vis the orders passed by the courts below, I do not find that any of the exceptional circumstances, to decline bail to a juvenile, as indicated in Section 12 of the Act of 2015, is made out.

9. In view of the aforesaid discussion, this revision petition is allowed and the order dated 13.02.2024 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sriganganagar as well as order dated 20.02.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge (Juvenile Court), Sriganganagar, declining bail to the petitioner are hereby set aside.

10. It is ordered that the juvenile accused-petitioner Kishori S D/o Suraj, shall be released on bail in FIR No. 34/2024, PS Sadul Shahar, Dist. Sriganganagar upon furnishing a personal bond by her legal guardian, in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sriganganagar; with the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top