SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 280

Rajasthan High Court
Honble DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.
Manchha Ram - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2773 of 1999
Decided On : April 19, 2000

Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Bishnoi, for Petitioner Sagar Mal Mehta, Advocate General, R.L. Jangid and Rajendra Vyas, Additional Advocates General and Sandeep Bhandawat, for Respondents

Headnote:Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Govt. Servants Rules, 1996, Rule 10; Constitution of India, Art. 14 and 16 – Employment on compassionate ground – Claimed for appointment after three years – Rejected being below 18 years of age – Filed Writ petition seeking relaxation in age in view of circulars issued by competent authority – Held – The very purpose of compassionate employment is to redeem the family from immediate financial hardship – The amendment in Rule 10(3) to make it available to a dependent wherever he attains majority, cannot be sustained in the eyes of law being violative of the provisions of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution – It opens a mode of employment by succession which is not permissible in law – Inordinate delay would not serve the purpose – The said clause being ultra vires was struck down – The judgment will have a prospective effect even in the case of the petitioner, if already appointed he will not be disturbed. (Paras 6,27,28 & 30)

       

Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The instant writ petition has been filed for seeking employment on compassionate ground under the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependants of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 (for short, ``the Rules, 1996).

(2). The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that petitioners father died in harness on 23.4.94 while working as Class IV employee in the Co-operative Department and as the petitioner was minor at that time, after passing Middle Standard Examination in the month of April, 1997, he applied for employment on compassionate ground under the said Rules of 1996 by submitting an application on 19.5.97. However, after correspondence at different levels in the Department, the application was rejected vide order dated 25.3.98 (Annex. 4) on the ground that he was below 18 years of age and was not eligible for appointment. The petition has been filed on the ground that under certain Circulars issued by the Competent Authority, a person is eligible for employment at the age of 16 years in special circumstances and petitioner could not have been denied employment on this ground.

(3). When this Court raised the issue: whether compassionate employment can be claimed at such a belated stage, it was pointed out that the Old Rules, i.e. the Rajasthan Recruitment of the Dependants of Deceased Government Servant Dying while in Service Rules, 1975 (for short, ``the Rules, 1975), provided that a dependant of deceased employee may apply for employment on compassionate ground after attaining the majority and initially the Rules, 1996 did not contain any such analogous provision but the said Rules of 1996 stood amended by the State Government vide Notification dated 19.4.99 (Annex.9). Para 4 of the said Notification provides the amendment of rule 10 of the Rules, 1996, by which in Sub-rule (3) of rule 10, the period for submitting the application has been fixed as three months instead of forty-five days. It also provides for furnishing the details of income of other family members from all sources. It further reads as under:-

``In case the husband or wife, as the case may be, is not willing for employment and the eldest of the dependants has not attained the age of 18 years, the information to this effect may be furnished to the Head of the Department within the period of three months from the date of the death of the employee and the limitation of applying for service of three months shall be counted from the date of attaining the age of 18 years.

(4). Thus, it has been contended on behalf of the petitioner by Mr. Vijay Bishnoi that by the aforesaid amendment, a dependant has a right to get employment on compassionate ground whenever he attains the age of eighteen years, provided the information regarding his minority has been furnished within the period of three months from the date of death of the employee and, thus, there can be no embargo/inhibition in getting compassionate employment even at such a belated stage.

(5). This Court suo moto issued notice to the State as well as to the learned Advocate General on 6.8.99 as why this proviso, which enables a dependant to claim employment on compassionate ground at any belated stage after attaining the majority, should not be struck down as the same might be violative of the provisions of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The learned Advocate General appeared in pursuance of the said notice and submitted that this Court has competence to examine the validity of the said provision suo moto and this view stands fortified by the judgment of this Court (Jaipur Bench) in Ghanshyam Avasthi vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (1).

(6). There can be no quarrel to the legal proposition that mere pendency of an application does not create any legal right in favour of the applicant, (Vide Union of India & Ors. vs. Indian Charge Chrome & Anr. (2). Matter requires to be decided as per the law prevailing on the date of decision making. Moreso, even if the law stood ame





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top