JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

Learned counsel for the appellants has prayed that the defect(s) as has been pointed out by the office, may be ignored.

2. Considering the same, the defect(s) as has been pointed

3. The instant intra-court appeal, under clause 10 of the out by the office, is hereby, ignored.

Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 06.08.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 502 of 2017 by which the writ petition has been dismissed.

4. It appears from the order dated 25.04.2023 that while issuing notice upon the party to the proceeding, the appellant had also been directed to serve copy of delay condonation application as well as of Letters Patent Appeal upon the additional party.

5. Accordingly, notice had been issued and in turn thereof, vakalatnama has been filed.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants now seeks leave of this Court to allow him to implead writ petitioner no.6, i.e., Damodar Prasad as respondent no.11 to the memo of appeal.

7. However, it is very peculiar that the office, without verifying the fact that the writ petitioner no.6, i.e., Damodar Prasad has not been impleaded as party to the proceeding, has iss