JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

Notices have been issued upon respondent nos. 5 and 6, which has been received by the Clerk of the institution concerned but they have chosen not to appear.

2. This Court considering the notice to be validly served and as such with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being heard on the delay condonation application first before entering into the merit of the issue.

3. The instant intra-court appeal, under clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 24.08.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 3005 of 2010 whereby and whereunder the writ petition has been dismissed by declining to pass positive direction for regularization of services of the petitioner in the scale of Assistant Teacher w.e.f. 01.05.1993 and refused to quash order dated 29.03.2009 passed by Director, Secondary Education rejecting the representation of the petitioner for regularization of his service.

I.A. No. 1321 of 2020

4. The instant appeal is admittedly barred by limitation since there is delay of 586 days in preferring the appeal, therefore, an application being I.A. No. 1321 of 2020 has been file