Back
SUBHASH CHAND
Pradeep Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of high court in criminal revision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations against the petitioner and response by prosecution. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. criteria for framing charges under section 227. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. evidentiary support for the prosecution's case. (Para 7 , 8 , 40) |
| 5. court's rationale for trial proceedings. (Para 35 , 39) |
| 6. final order and dismissal of the revision. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH CHAND, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2.
2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the order dated 2nd April, 2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Spl. Judge, Dumka in S.T. Case No. 127 of 2021, arising out of Deoghar (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 13 of 2019 registered under Sections 376 , 511, 354-A, 354-B, 354-D, 379, 506, 509 and 34 of the I.P.C. whereby the discharge petition filed by the petitioner under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned court below has completely erred in dismissing the discharge application of the petitioner by passing a very cryptic order
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
