Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Usha Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for removal of procedural defects. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. introduction of the intra-court appeal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. delay condonation application introduced. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. admission of nullity in departmental proceedings. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court must first consider delay before merits. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. principle of limitation cited. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. bona fide conduct essential for delay condonation. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. government entities must adhere to limitation laws. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 9. need for comprehensive evidence for delay justifications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. specific grounds of inaction evaluated. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 11. denial of delay condonation based on principles laid. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 12. final dismissal of applications and appeal. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, A.C.J.
I.A. No. 5600 of 2025
1. Mr. Ashutosh Anand, learned A.A.G-III has submitted that there are some defects pointed out by the Office and as such he has filed an interlocutory application being I.A. No. 5600 of 2025 for removal of the same. The said interlocutory application has been taken up. The instant interlocutory application has been filed seeking exemp
Sufficient cause must be shown for condoning delay in filing appeals; lack of diligence and negligence is crucial for the court's discretion.
A comprehensive understanding of delay condonation necessitates showing bona fide reasons and adequate justification, especially for governmental appellants, with established precedents reinforcing t....
The court held that administrative delays are insufficient for condoning significant delays in appeals, emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to limitation laws and the necessity for bona fi....
The Court emphasized that sufficient cause for condoning appeal delays must include diligence and bona fides; ignorance of law and financial hardship alone are insufficient grounds for delay beyond t....
The court ruled that an inordinate delay in filing an appeal requires a sufficient explanation, and negligence or lack of bona fides can lead to dismissal of the application for condonation.
The court emphasized that sufficient cause must be shown for condoning delay in filing appeals, with negligence and inaction being critical factors.
The law of limitation is to be strictly enforced, and parties, including the government, must provide sufficient cause for any delay in filing appeals; negligence or lack of bona fides will not justi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a sufficient cause and bona fide motive when seeking condonation of delay.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of demonstrating a bona fide motive and sufficient cause for delay condonation, highlighting that the law of limitation must be applied with all its rigour when....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
