IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, JJ.
M/s Kamala Agencies – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha and another – Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 17471 of 2022
Decided on : 11-08-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of petitioner and the tender process (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against exclusion (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations and reasoning (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 4. judicial principles and legal reasoning applied (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 5. final order of the court (Para 82 , 83) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R. SARANGI, J.
The Petitioner, which is a registered Proprietorship Firm, by means of this Writ Petition seeks to quash Clause-5.2 of the Tender Call Notice bearing Bid Reference No.OSMCL/2022-23/DRUGS-VETERINARY/14 dated 20.06.2022 under Annexure-7, and to issue direction to the Opposite Parties to allow it to participate in the tender process for the year 2022-23.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in a nutshell, is that Petitioner, being a registered Dealer, Whole-seller, Supplier and Distributor of veterinary drugs, medicines, vaccines, chemicals, veterinary instruments and equipments having valid registration and permission from the State as well as Central Government Authorities, has been supplying the items, as mentioned above, to various Government/Semi-Government Organizations as well as PSUs for the last 15 years at a highly competitive price. The Petitioner is the prime Distributor of veterinary items of reputed international companies like Cadila Healthcare Limited, Zydus and Boehringer Ingelheim etc.
2.1 The Director, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, issued Tender Call Notice for supply of veterinary drugs/medicines and vaccines for the years 2015-16, 2017-18 and 2019-20 fixing the eligibility criteria that the tenderer should be a Manufacturer or authorized Distributor or authorized Dealer having valid registration of the product, along with three years experience in supplying veterinary drugs/medicines, vaccines, instruments and equipments of its own manufacturing or of reputed Manufacturers of national level to Government/Semi-Government, PSUs, UNO agencies. In the Tender Call Notice for the years 2017-18 and 2019-20, mention had been made that tenderer’s annual business turn-over in supplying veterinary drugs/medicines, vaccines, instruments and equipments should be Rs.5 crores for preceding three years. The Petitioner, having satisfied the condition stipulated in the tender documents, participated in the tender process and came out successful for the year 2015-16, 2017-18 and 2019-20 and consequentially bilateral agreements were duly executed with the Petitioner and on the basis of purchase orders issued, it had carried on supplying the required items.
2.2 The Director, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, invited tender for supply of veterinary drugs/medicines and vaccines for the year 2020-21, vide Bid Reference No. DAHVS/2020-21/Veterinary Drugs/01 dated 04.12.2020. But the Distributors, like the Petitioner, who were otherwise allowed to participate in the process of bid in the preceding years, were restricted from participating in the tender process. Subsequently, vide letter dated 24.03.2021, the tender for the year 202021 was cancelled on the ground that certain procedural lapses were observed in the said tender process by the Departmental Tender Committee. As a consequence thereof, for the year 2020-21, as the agreement with the Petitioner for the year 2019-20 was still subsisting, vide letter dated 05.07.2021, indent for supply of medicines, vaccines, instruments and equipments was placed by the Directorate of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services.
2.3 Deviation to the earlier practice, the tender for supply of veterinary items like vete
Association of Registration Plates Vs. Union of India and others
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Commr. Of Customs
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail
Ajay Kumar Jain v. State of Odisha
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttarpradesh
Balaji Ventures Pvt Ltd v. Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd
Caretel Infotech v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2019) 14 SCC 81
Chitaranjan Mishra v. State of Odisha and others reported in 2016 2 OLR 735
Directorate of Education v. Educomp Datamatics Ltd
In re: Special Reference No.1 of 2012
I.R. Coelho vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Jindal Steel & Power Limited v. Odisha Coal and Power Limited
Jagruti Welfare Organization, Bhubaneswar, represented through its Secretary
Kulja Industries Limited v. Chief Gen. Manager, W.T. Proj. BSNL
LIC of India v. Consumer Education & Research Centre
MRF Ltd. v. CST., (2006) 8 SCC 702
Montecarlo Limited v. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited
Municipal Corporation, Ujjain v. BVG India
M.P. Gangadharan v. State of Kerala
Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Powai Panchsheel Co-operative Housing Society v. M.H.A.D.A.
Priya Gupta v State of Chhattisgarh
Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. v. Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority
Reliance Energy Limited v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Limited
Radha Krishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar
Reliance Telecom Ltd. v. Union of India
Reliance Airport Developers (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India and others -(2006) 10 SCC 1
Ramana Dayarama Shetty v. International Airports Authority of India
S.G.Jaisinghani v. Union of India, AIR 1967 SC 1427
Style (Dress Land) v. Union Territory, Chandigarh
Silppi Constructions Contractors v. Union of India
Sonebhadra Fuels v. Commr., Trade tax, Sale Tax Tribunal
Sterling Computer Limited v. M/s. M & N Publications Limited
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Union of India v. Dinesh Engineering Corporation
Uflex Ltd v. Government of Tamil Nadu
Union of India v. Ashok Leyland Ltd.
Union of India v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.
Union of India Vs. International Trading Co.
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited v. State of Karnataka and others
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.