Back
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Raghunath Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts leading to the petition (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's scholarship on delay and laches (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. arguments from the petitioner relating to seniority and appointment (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis and findings on merits and claims (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. consequences of misrepresentation and failure of proof (Para 11) |
| 6. final conclusion and verdict of the court (Para 12) |
| 7. the judgement distinguishes between timely remedies versus stale claims in administrative matters. (Para 13) |
| 8. the court's role extends to preventing disruptions in established administrative hierarchies based on stale claims. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
The challenge:
1.1. After abolition of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal by virtue of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) Notification F. No. A-11014/10/2015-AT [G.S.R.552(E).], dated 2nd August, 2019), the said case having been transferred to this Court, O.A. No. 435 of 2018 has been registered as WPC (OA) No.435 of 2018.
2. The facts leading the petitioner to come up before this Court as culled out from the pleadings of the writ petition, are narrated.
2.2. It is stated that though the li
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
