ANOOP CHITKARA
Amritpal Singh @ Manna – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 39 | 24.02.2022 | Division No.5, Ludhiana | 392, 473, 411 IPC and section 25 of Arms Act |
The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above, on the allegations of forcibly taking away Rs.70,000/- at gun point, in association of his accomplices, from the office of Western Union, has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. The status report mentions a series of offences of robbery. In paragraph 6 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
| Sr. No. | FIR No. | Dated | Offences | Police Station |
| 1. | 248 | 30.09.2021 | 61, 78(2), 1 and 14 of Punjab Excise Act | Division No.6, Ludhiana |
3. Petitioner's counsel argued that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
4. While opposing the bail, State's counsel contends that given the criminal past, the accused is likely to indulge in crime once released on bail.
Reasoning:
5. In Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi v. State of U.P. , (2012) 3 SCC 382, Ho
Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi v. State of U.P.
Paramjeet Singh v. State of Punjab
Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi, (2001) 4 SCC 280
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for the court to act judiciously with reasonableness when considering bail for an accused with a criminal history, and the imposition of s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court in granting bail, the need for judicious consideration of bail petitions, and the imposition of stringent conditions to....
The court can grant bail with stringent conditions based on the criminal antecedents and nature of allegations, ensuring compliance and preventing influence on the investigation or intimidation of wi....
The judgment establishes the principle that bail decisions should consider the cumulative effect of circumstances, including the nature of the allegations, criminal history, and the need for stringen....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to consider the accused's criminal history, the nature of allegations, and the possibility of influencing the investigation and intimidati....
The grant of bail must consider the cumulative effect of various circumstances justifying the grant or refusal of bail, and stringent conditions can be imposed to prevent influencing the investigatio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.