R.B.MISRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. , CEGAT – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and order dated 5. 12. 2001 passed by respondent No. 2 The Customs, Excise and Cold (Control) Appellant Tribunal, New Delhi under Section 35 (c) (1) of the Central Excise Act 1945 (in short called act) allowing the appeal directing both the divisions for a common central registration or transfer of the credit from distillery division to the Sugar Division by setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner Central Excise. Heard Sri Subodh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Bharat Ji Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate alongwith Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondents.
( 2 ) THE facts necessary for adjudication of the present writ petition are that the appellant company has two manufacturing Divisions, one of them manufacturing Sugar and Molasses and the other manufacturing Industrial and potable Alcohol. The Sugar Division and the Chemical (Distillery)Division are located across a public road. They have separate Central Excise registration and are maintaining separate statutory records. The respondent wanted to have a c
A.Venkateshwarah Naidu v. S. Challappa and Ors.
Aligarh Muslim University and Ors. v. Mansoor Ali Khan
Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. Sita Ram
Commissioner Income Tax, Lucknow v. U.P. Forest Corporation
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. v. Ludh Budh Singh
F.Auto Gas Industries v. Union of India
G. Veerappa Pillai v. Raman and Raman Ltd.
G.K.N. Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer and Ors.
Govt. of A.P. and Ors. v. Sridevi and Ors.
Harbans Lal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Hridya Narain v. Income Tax Officer, Bareilly
Jai Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Kamta Gupta (Dr. Smt.) v. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya Sitapur (U.P.) and Ors.)
Kerata State Electricity Board and Anr. v. Kurien E.Kolathi and Ors.
K.S. Rashid and Sons v. Income Tax investigation Commission and Ors.
LL Sudhakar Reddy and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Municipal Board, Khurai and Anr. v. Kamal Kumar and Anr.
P.G. I. of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh v. Raj Kumar
Pradeep Kumar Singh v. U.P. State Sugar Corporation and Anr.
R. Kishore Biswas v. State of Tripura
Rajasthan State Transport Corporation v. Krishna Kant
ST. Mathuswami v. K. Natarajan and Ors.
Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Kota
Shivgovinda Anna Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Siliguri Municipality v. Amalendu Das and Ors.
State of Bihar and Ors. v. Jain Plastics and Chemicals Ltd.
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. v. Raja Mahendra Pal and Ors.
State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. v. Bhailal Bhai etc. etc.
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Mohammed Noor
Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Titagarh Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa and Anr.
Union of India and Ors. v. T.R. Verma
UPSRTC and Anr. v. Krishna and Ors.
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.