SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1059

Mukesh son of Bal Mukund, Heera Lal son of Ratan Singh and Guddu son of Late – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
GAURAV SHARMA,

B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed with prayer that a Writ, order or direction be issued in the nature of certiorari, commanding the respondents to send the entire record and the proceedings against the petitioners, for quashing the same, as well as for issuing a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to provide a copy of the case diary and other proceedings related to petitioners, in order to enable them to defend their case.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that a First Information Report (hereinafter called f. I. R. ) in Case crime No. 60 of 2005, under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter called i. P. C)was lodged with the Police Station Saidabad, District Hathras (Mahamayanagar) on 13. 3. 2005. In the F. I. R. , two persons were named as accused. The names of the petitioners do not find mention in the said F. I. R. In pursuance of the same, investigation commenced, and it appears that during investigation, the names of the petitioners were also revealed. Accordingly, the police is trying to apprehend the petitioners. In such an eventuality, the Investigating Officer filed an application in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Saidabad D









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top