SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 962

RITU RAJ AWASTHI, VIRENDRA KUMAR
Meera @ Ashmeer – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nagendra Mohan, Adv., Mohd Arif Khan, Adv., Nadeem Murtaza, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Virendra Kumar, J.

Heard Sri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for appellants as well as Mr. Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Government Advocate on behalf of the State and perused the lower court record.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants, Meera @ Ashmeer, Mehndi Hasan, Muneem, Shamsuddin and Saneel @ Sanda, assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 19.07.2007 delivered by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge/ Fast Track Court No. 3, Hardoi in Sessions Trial No. 758 of 2005 arising out of Case Crime No. 146 of 2005 and connected Sessions Trial Nos. 759 of 2005, 760 of 2005, 761 of 2005 and 762 of 2005, arising out of Crime Nos. 147 to 150 of 2005, for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and 3/25 of Arms Act, of Police Station Manjhila, District Hardoi.

3. The learned trial court has convicted all the appellants for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and amount of Rs.500/- has been imposed on each of the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 147 I.P.C.; for the offence p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top