J. J. MUNIR
Surendra Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.J. MUNIR, J.
1. The reliefs sought in this petition are so many and so much lavish in detail, that it would be wise to quote the prayer clause verbatim. The prayer clause (limited to the material reliefs alone here) reads:
(ii) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the arrears of increment of July 2009 for the period July 2009 to November 2010 alongwith interest.
(iii) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the arrears of increment of July 2010 for the period July 2010 to November 2010 alongwith interest.
(iv) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents that the petitioner may be given the benefit of revised pay scale of Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- with effect from 1.2.2010 alongwith interest.
(v) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents that the petitioner may be provided the payment of differen
A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India
Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar vs. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Prabhu Dayal Khandelwal vs. UPSC
Ramesh Chandra Mishra vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission, Allahabad and Others
Rukhsana Shaheen Khan vs. Union of India
Rukhsana Shaheen Khan vs. Union of India and Others
Sukhdev Singh vs. Union of India
State of Maharashtra vs. Public Concern for Governance Trust
Union of India and Others vs. Anil Kumar Sarkar
Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.