SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2547

PRITINKER DIWAKER, ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Jps Buildtech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Pranjal Shukla, Advocate
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that he is not pressing prayer No. 2.

2. Order accordingly.

3. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.

4. In absence of any dispute as to fact, the matter has been proceeded with the consent of parties at the fresh stage itself.

5. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 18.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-9, Meerut, for the tax period 2020 to 2021, whereby demand in excess to Rs. 54,76,018/- has been raised against the present petitioner.

6. Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on 14.07.2023 seeking its reply by 14.08.2023.

7. Relying on Section 75 (4) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') as interpreted by a coordinate bench of this Court in Bharat Mint & Allied Chemicals v. Commissioner Commerical Tax & 2 Ors., (2022) 48 VLJ 325, it has been then asserted, the Assessing Authority was bound to afford opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before he ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top