SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2302

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, MANISH KUMAR
Brijesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anurag Mishra.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State respondents.

2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 06.12.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-1, Raebareli for the tax period 2018-19, whereby demand in excess to Rs.27,23,636/- has been raised against the present petitioner.

3. Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on 28.09.2022 seeking his reply within 30 days. Referring to item no. 3 of the table appended to that notice, it has been pointed out, the Assessing Authority had at that stage itself chosen to not give any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by mentioning "NA" against column description "Date of personal hearing". Similar endorsements were made against the columns for "Time of personal hearing" and "Venue where personal hearing will be held". Thus, it is the objection of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was completely denied opportunity of oral hearing before the Assessing Authority.

4. Relying on Section 75 (4) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top