SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1759

SHEKHAR B. SARAF
Meera Glass Industries – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vishwjit.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Shekhar B. Saraf, J.

Heard Sri Vishwjit, counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated July 12, 2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2, (Appeal), Judicial Division, State Tax, Mainpuri (hereinafter referred to as the 'Respondent No. 2') for the tax period of April, 2021.

3. Upon perusal of the record and after hearing of the counsel for the parties, it is clear that an opportunity of 'personal hearing' was not afforded to the petitioner which is a mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax, Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act").

4. The significance of the word "or'' in Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 cannot be underestimated. The usage of the word "or'' extends beyond its disjunctive function; it serves as a pivotal indicator of legislative intent regarding the necessity of providing an opportunity for personal hearing. By incorporating "or'' into the statutory language, lawmakers explicitly delineate two distinct scenarios in which the opportuni

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top