Back
VIPIN SANGHI
Maa Ambey Traders – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Ms. Mamta Bisht, proxy counsel for Mr. Chetan Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners wish to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
The court's acceptance of the petitioners' withdrawal led to the dismissal of the writ petition and pending applications.
The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, and the court granted the request.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh.
The court allows the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition upon application by the petitioner.
The court has the discretion to dismiss a writ petition if the petitioner seeks to withdraw it.
A petitioner has the liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed before the Court at their discretion, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
The court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of a writ petition in the interest of justice.
The court acknowledges and accepts the withdrawal of writ petitions as requested by the petitioners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
