SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Maa Ambey Traders & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Bank of India & Anr. - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 891 of 2018
Decided On : 11-01-2023

Important Points

The court's acceptance of the petitioners' withdrawal led to the dismissal of the writ petition and pending applications.

Subject

Civil Law - Writ Petitions

Headnote

Withdrawal of Writ Petition - Dismissal

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners expressed their wish to withdraw the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of any pending applications.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioners' expressed wish to withdraw the writ petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and any pending applications were also dismissed.

Advocates appeared:
Mamta Bisht, Advocate, Ashish Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Ms. Mamta Bisht, proxy counsel for Mr. Chetan Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners wish to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top