SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, CJ.
Maa Ambey Traders & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Bank of India & Anr. - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 891 of 2018
Decided On : 11-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mamta Bisht, Advocate, Ashish Joshi, Advocate

The court's acceptance of the petitioners' withdrawal led to the dismissal of the writ petition and pending applications.

Headnote:

Withdrawal of Writ Petition - Dismissal

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners expressed their wish to withdraw the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of any pending applications.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioners' expressed wish to withdraw the writ petition.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and any pending applications were also dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, CJ. - Ms. Mamta Bisht, proxy counsel for Mr. Chetan Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners wish to withdraw the present writ petition.

2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top