SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 916

G. S. AHLUWALIA, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Ghanshyam Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anoop Nigam, Advocate, C.P. Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastav, J. - This common judgment shall also govern disposal of Criminal appeal No.483 of 2011 filed by appellant -arvind alias Lalla. Since the factual matrix in both the criminal appeals is same, therefore, for the sake of convenience, they are heard simultaneously.

(2) Being dissatisfied with the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 29-03-2011 passed by Special Judge & additional Sessions Judge, Datia (MP) in Sessions Trial No.123 of 2006, both Criminal appeals under Section 374(2) of CrPC has been preferred, by which appellants have been sentenced and convicted as under:-

Offence

Sentence

Section 148 of IPC

Two-two years rigorous imprisonment

Section 302/149 of IPC for commission of murder of deceased Sahab Singh and Ramswaroop

Rigorous Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-

Section 323 /149 of IPC (three counts) for causing injuries to injured Hakim Singh, afsar and Smt. avdeshbai

Six- six months rigorous imprisonment

all the sentences were directed to run concurrently. all the appellants were directed to pay Rs.10,000

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top