MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, S.R.SEN
Registrar General, High Court of Meghalaya – Appellant
Versus
Patricia Mukhim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.R. Sen, J.
This contempt proceeding had to be initiated on the basis of the reports published in the "Shillong Times" dated 06.12.2018 and 10.12.2018 under the caption "When Judges judge for themselves". The contents of the news item are reproduced herein below for ready reference and perusal:
SHILLONG: The High Court of Meghalaya has said the government should include spouse and children of retired judges for medical treatment and other facilities.
During the hearing of the petition of Registrar General, the High Court of Meghalaya against the State Government on Wednesday, the single bench headed by Justice SR Sen said the additional advocate general filed an affidavit regarding medical facilities to retired judges.
However, the court said it appears that the benefits as per the affidavit were given only to retired judges.
"The government is directed to revise the said rule as follows:
"Retired judges spouse/children?. So, it means that they should include spouse and children for medical treatment. The Law Secretary is directed to revise the same as ordered above within a week," the order said.
Protocol
Arun Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P.
Bal Kishan Giri v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Bal Thackrey v. Harish Pimpalkhute & Ors.
Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar
Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court
Bathina Ramakrishna Reddy v. State of Madras
Bhushan Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Biman Basu v. Kallol Guha Thakurta & Anr.
Brahmaprakash Sharma and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
C. Elumalai v. A.G.L. Irudayaraj
Debabrata Bandopadhyay v. State of W.B.
Dr. Prodip Kumar Biswas v. Subrata Das & Ors.
H.G. Rangangoud v. M/s State Trading Corpn. of India Ltd.
Hailakandi Bar Assn v. State of Assam
In Re : Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
In Re : Harijai Singh and another
In Re : Vinay Chandra Mishra (the alleged contemner)
Maninderjit Singh Bitta v. Union of India
Mohd. Zahir Khan v. Vijai Singh 1992 Supp (2) SCC 72: 1992 SCC(Cri) 526
Mrityunjoy Das & Anr. v. Sayed Hasibur Rahaman & Ors.
Muthu Karuppan, Commissioner of Police, Chennai v. Parithi Ilamvazhuthi & Anr.
P.N. Duda v. P Shiv Shanker & Ors.
Patel Rajnikant Dhulabhai .v. Patel Chandrakant Dhulabhai
R.S. Sehrawat v. Rajeev Malhotra & Ors.
Ranveer Yadav v. State of Bihar
Sahdeo Alias Sahdeo Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
State of Karnataka & Anr. v. Pastor P. Raju
State of West Bengal & Anr. v. Mohd. Khalid & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.