R.S.CHAUHAN, SHAMEEM AKTHER
Deccan Archaeological & Cultural Research Institute – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad rep by the Principal Secretary – Respondent
ORDER:
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, J.
1. The looming threat of demolition of a 150 years old palace, Irrum Manzil, due to the decision of the Council of Ministers on 18.06.2019, to construct a new legislative complex at the site of the palace, has agitated the people of Hyderabad. For, the proposed construction of the legislative complex would be possible only with the demolition of the palace. Proud as people are of their heritage and culture of the beautiful city of Hyderabad, eight Public Interest Litigation (‘PIL’) writ petitions have been filed, challenging the said decision, before this Court.
2. Writ Petition (PIL) No. 86 of 2019, and Writ Petition (PIL) No. 79 of 2019, which have challenged the proposed demolition of the Irrum Munzil, shall be dealt with herein under. For, the most meaningful arguments have been raised by both the parties in these two writ petitions. The other writ petitions, namely W. P. (PIL) Nos. 64, 65, 73, 75, and 80 of 2019 shall be decided separately, but in light of the decision of these two writ petitions. The W.P. (PIL) No. 81 of 2019 shall also be
AIIMS Students’ Union v. State of West Bengal (2002) 1 SCC 428)
Brij Mohan Lal v Union of India (2012) 6 SCC 502)
Bharathidasan University v. All India Council for Technical Education (2001) 8 SCC 676
Bharat Cooperative Bank (Mumbai) v. Cooperative Bank Employees Union (2007) 4 SCC 685)
Bansidhar v. State of Rajasthan (1989) 2 SCC 557)
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B.S. Muddappa (1991) 4 SCC 54)
Chandrika Jha v. State of Bihar (1984) 2 SCC 41)
Gauri Shankar Gaur v. State of U.P. (1994) 1 SCC 92)
Girnar Traders v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 3 SCC 1)
Hari Kishan Bhargav v. Union of India (AIR 1966 SC 619)
Justiniano Augusto De Piedade Barreto v. Antonio Vicente Da Fonseca (1979) 3 SCC 47
Jal Mahal Resorts Private Limited v. K.P. Sharma (2014) 8 SCC 804)
Janhit Manch through its President Bhagvanji Raiyani v. State of Maharashtra (2019) 2 SCC 505)
Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India (2000) 2 SCC 536
Lalji Raja v. Hansraj Nathuram (1971) 1 SCC 721
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited v. Union of India (1979) 2 SCC 529)
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 4 SCC 200)
Manohar Lal v. Ugrasen (2010) 11 SCC 557)
M/s Ujagar Prints v. Union of India (1989) 3 SCC 488)
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Vasant Rao (2002) 7 SCC 657)
Ramsharan Autyanuprasi v. Union of India (AIR 1989 SC 549)
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohan Singh (2012) 13 SCC 281
State of Maharashtra v. Madhavrao Damodar Patil (AIR 1968 SC 1395)
State of Punjab v. Mohar Singh Pratap Singh
State of Punjab v. Hari Kishan (1966) 2 SCR 982
Union of India v. Kannadapara Sanghatanegala Okkuta & Kannadigara (2002) 10 SCC 226
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.