Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
TAN MAN HOW – Appellant
Versus
INNOBIM CONSULTANCY SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference under industrial relations act (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dismissal and employment terms (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. claimant's allegations and defense (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. company's defense and justifications (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's role in dismissal cases (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. probationary employee rights (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. issues to be determined (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. evidence evaluation and findings (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 9. timing of termination (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 10. good faith and justifiable grounds for dismissal (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 11. final ruling and compensation awarded (Para 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
Reference
[1] This is a reference pursuant to s 20 (3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("The Act") arising out of the alleged dismissal of Tan Man How ("Claimant") by Innobim Consultancy Sdn Bhd ("Company") on the 24 March 2023.
[2] The Director General of Industrial Relation's reference in this case requires the Court to hear and determine the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the Company on 24 March 2023.
[3] Both the Claimant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
