Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Court Authority for Land Encroachment Investigation - The court can issue a commission for local investigation or measurement of encroachment at the final stage of a suit, especially when factual determination of encroachment extent is contested or unclear. Under Order XXVI, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code, courts have the power to appoint commissioners to conduct such investigations to elucidate disputes regarding land encroachment ["2023 0 Supreme(HP) 521"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 2024"], ["2017 0 Supreme(Tri) 96"].
Necessity of Commission for Land Measurement - Several cases emphasize that proving encroachment often requires an investigation by an authorized commissioner, such as a survey or demarcation, to establish the extent of encroachment accurately. Courts have directed commissions to measure land, identify boundaries, and prepare maps, especially when the encroachment is disputed or the land's boundaries are unclear ["2007 0 Supreme(All) 1593"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 60"], ["2017 0 Supreme(Tri) 96"].
Timing of Commission Appointment - Courts generally hold that appointment of a commission is permissible at the final stage of a suit, particularly during the final hearing or before passing final orders, to ensure precise determination of encroached areas. The courts have also noted that conducting such investigations earlier may cause delays; thus, they are often ordered at the concluding stages to avoid unnecessary prolongation ["2023 0 Supreme(HP) 521"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1163"].
Limitations and Conditions - Courts have clarified that commissions should be ordered only when necessary, and the parties' objections or the sufficiency of existing evidence are considered. Moreover, if the parties have already adduced sufficient evidence or if the land boundaries are undisputed, a commission may not be warranted ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 60"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1574"].
Specific Case Examples - In cases where the extent of encroachment involves minor differences (e.g., 3 feet), courts have still authorized commissions to resolve factual disputes, as seen in cases where the width of pathways or roads is contested. These investigations help establish the precise encroachment extent, which is crucial for granting relief ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 60"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1574"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the cited cases, a commission for land encroachment investigation can indeed be ordered at the final argument stage of a suit. Courts recognize the importance of accurate measurement and demarcation in disputes involving encroachment of even a few feet, such as 3 feet. The authority is grounded in procedural provisions (Order XXVI, Rule 9 CPC), and such commissions are typically ordered to aid in fact-finding when the dispute's resolution depends on precise boundary determination. Therefore, in the scenario where there is a dispute over a 3-foot encroachment, a court can validly direct a commission to investigate and measure the land at the final stage of the suit.
Land disputes, especially those involving , can be contentious and fact-heavy. Imagine you're in the midst of a , reaching the stage of , and a key issue remains: Did the defendant encroach 3 feet onto your property? At-the stage of final argument of the suit can a investigation be done? This question arises frequently in boundary disputes, where precise measurements matter.
In this post, we delve into the legal nuances under the , particularly , examining when courts may appoint a commissioner for or survey—even during . We'll draw from key judgments and principles to provide clarity. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Courts generally prefer or survey to establish , especially when facts are disputed 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195. Appointment of a Commissioner for site inspection or survey is justified when the matter cannot be effectively determined from existing records and evidence 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195 2011 1 Supreme 537.
The power stems from CPC, which allows courts to order local investigations for the purpose of elucidating any matter in dispute. As noted in one case, In a suit for injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the possession due to alleged into the land of the plaintiff, one of the methods to find out as to whether or not there is is to have the done by a competent Commissioner 2022 0 Supreme(All) 709 2016 0 Supreme(All) 601.
However, this isn't a blanket permission. The court's discretion hinges on necessity and sufficiency of existing evidence 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195.
Legal procedures favor conducting a survey or when there is ambiguity regarding boundaries, extent of , or disputed facts that cannot be conclusively determined from pleadings and evidence 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195. For instance:- In Ponnusamy v Salem Vaiyapamalat Hangamar Sangam, the court justified to resolve whether constructions encroached upon neighboring land 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195.- Courts emphasize that such steps are essential in boundary disputes 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195.
From other precedents:- It is clear from the contention of the defendant in her written statement as well as Report of the Commissioner that the defendant has encroached on the 5 feet passage and built a house on it 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40716.- Ownership and possession claims require substantiation of evidence on and boundaries 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24102.
The timing of the investigation is crucial; such procedures are typically conducted before final orders or during interlocutory stages, not during unless necessary 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1521. Generally, investigations are ordered at an or before final judgment 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195. The court in Mahendranath v Purnanda highlighted that should be conducted early to inform parties and facilitate fair adjudication 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195.
Yet, courts retain flexibility. Powers under can be exercised at any stage, but for limited purpose—when has already been done, there would be no need for fresh by appointing Commissioner 2023 0 Supreme(MP) 183. While ideally pre-judgment, courts may permit them during if evidence is inadequate 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195.
Key caveat: If evidence on record suffices, further investigation may be dispensed with 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195. In one judgment, the court declined a survey because existing evidence resolved the issue 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195. Similarly, A Commissioner for is deputed under CPC when the Court deems a to be requisite or proper 2022 0 Supreme(All) 709.
In , issues of led to commissioner appointments to ascertain facts, underscoring judicial discretion
.
requires notice to parties and opportunity to participate 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2180. Any survey must occur with interested parties present 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2180. Courts direct reports after giving parties a chance 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2180.
Additional insights:- Refusal of the request of the party to appoint a Commissioner under to make a in an appropriate case amounts to failure of exercise of 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 581.- Parties must get notice; e.g., in , prior deeds affect rights unless surrendered 2025 0 Supreme(Cal) 326.
These illustrate courts balance efficiency with justice.
For Parties: Request early; object if dilatory. Provide supporting docs like sale deeds 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24102.
Use commissioner judiciously: Not for evidence collection alone 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1521.
In summary, while courts may order land investigations during under exceptional need, they typically require pre-final clarity. Existing evidence often suffices, promoting efficiency. For your 3-foot dispute, early application strengthens position. Always seek professional counsel to navigate these intricacies.
References:1. 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 195: Survey necessity and timing.2. 2011 1 Supreme 537: in investigations.3. 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1521: Limits at final stages.4. Additional cases as cited inline.
#LandEncroachment #CourtCommissioner #PropertyLaw
It is alleged that the plaintiff-respondent No. 3 encroached 31 feet of land on the east side of the plot and 5 feet on the west side and in this regard, a notice was issued by the Society to the plaintiff to remove the illegal encroachment and construction on it. ... On the other hand, the Society has alleged that the plaintiff alone had encroached the land. Consequently, it was imperative for th....
Whether the plaintiff is co-owner in possession of the suit land as alleged? OPP. 2. Whether defendant is interfering in the suit land in an illegal manner? OPP. 3. Whether the suit is not maintainable? OPD. 4. ... There is no material on record to demonstrate that the plaintiff, at any stage, has approached the Revenue Authorities, for demarcation of the #HL_ST....
8.Whether the notice u/s 407 of West Bengal Municipal Act 1993 is essential ? 9.Whether the defendant encroached land of B schedule property? ... 3.Whether the suit is barred for non-joinder and mis- joinder of necessary parties ? 4. Whether the suit is barred under the principle of estoppel, weaver and acquicense ? ... To prove the point of encroachment of the B schedule property the plaintiffs....
(2) Does he further proves that the defendant has encroached the ‘B’ schedule land? (3) Whether the defendant proves that, he has perfected title over the property of the plaintiff if encroached, by adverse possession? ... The points for consideration raised by the First Appellate Court are only with regard to whether the plaintiff is the owner of the suit schedule ‘A’ property and in the year 19....
It is clear from the contention of the defendant in her written statement as well as Report of the Commissioner that the defendant has encroached on the 5 feet passage and built a house on it and therefore answer this issue in the affirmative in favour of the plaintiff. ... ISSUES 7, 8 AND 9: In view of my finding on issues 1 to 3, I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs prayed for. The plaintiff has satisf....
According to the plaintiff, the defendants/respondents has encroached over some part of the land of his ownership. ... According to the plaintiff he purchased the land vide registered sale deed Ext-P-2 from Deen Dayal and the suit property is a piece of that land but according to the defendant it is part of the property which he purchased from Sudhir Shrivastava vide registered sale deed Ext-D-3. ... Shri Sameer Saxena, learned coun....
(iii) Whether the plaintiff proves that after filing of the suit defendant has encroached 12 X 27½ feet in the northern portion of the suit schedule property as contended in para-3 of the plaint? ... The vital issue as to whether the road measures 10 feet or 20 feet was essential for deciding the encroachment of 12 x 27½ feet by the ....
defendant has encroached the suit schedule property and Issue No.4 is whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession 6 of the ‘B’ schedule property ... land by them as per Para 3 of the plaint. ... Issue No.1 is as to whether the plaintiff proves that she is the owner of ‘A’ schedule property and that the ‘B’ schedule forms part of the ‘A’ schedule property and is....
Whether impugned decree for demolition of structure is vitiated as the court below has failed to conclusively determine the factum and extent of alleged encroachment on suit land and thereby ordering the ascertainment of encroachment, if any, to be determined by way of demarcation at the execution stage ... (c) The defendant constructed a path over the suit land comprised in Khasra No. 52 and a room on Khasra No. 54 measuring 10 #H....
property and to ascertain as to whether there is any encroachment over the suit encroachment has been raised and therefore, in order to ascertain the the trial and on the basis of the pleading alleging encroachment over the land in question by the defendant ... no.1 over the plaintiff land for making injunction to stop construction or other work in the suit normal rule for issue a #H....
In a suit for injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the possession due to alleged encroachment into the land of the plaintiff, one of the methods to find out as to whether or not there is encroachment is to have the local investigation done by a competent Commissioner. 30. A Commissioner for local investigation is deputed under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC when the Court deems a local investigation to be requisite or proper for the purpose of elucidating any matter in dispute or for ascertaining any other matter mentioned in the said rule. The object of local i....
PW-1 would depose that there is a 6 feet cart track situate on the western side of his property. Admittedly 4 feet East West measurement is depreciated in plaintiff’s land. Hence, it is necessary to find whether the defendant has encroached the 4 feet of land in plaintiff’s property. To substantiate his case, the plaintiff has himself examined as PW-1.
In a suit for injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the possession due to alleged encroachment into the land of the plaintiff, one of the methods to find out as to whether or not there is encroachment is to have the local investigation done by a competent Commissioner.
Order passed by the learned appellate court reveals that both have purchased their respective land from the same plot and the original recorded owner is one Dhobi Charan Sahu. While the plaintiff pleads that a stripe of his purchased land adjoining to the eastern side boundary line of defendants purchased land has been encroached and the dimension of that encroached portion is 3.5 feet x 57 feet the defendants deny to have encroached that portion of the suit land taking the specific stand that it is a part of their purchased land and there has been no encroachment as alleged.#HL_EN....
Refusal of the request of the party to appoint a Commissioner under O. 26, R. 9 CPC to make a local investigation in an appropriate case amounts to failure of exercise of jurisdiction vested In it. The Court cannot prevent a party from adducing the best evidence, if such evidence can be gathered with the help of a Commissioner. "In a suit for injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the possession due to alleged encroachment into the land of plaintiff, one of the methods to find out as to whether or not there is encroachment is to have the local investigation don....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
