AI Overview

AI Overview...

#LegalInsights, #CourtJudgments, #Aug2019Cases

Understanding 'Aug 2019 No Further Information Reported' in Legal Contexts


In various Indian court judgments and legal documents, phrases like 'Aug 2019 no further information reported' or similar references to no further details, no further information, and events tied to August 2019 frequently appear. These often signal points where proceedings halted, compliance was incomplete, or courts noted absent details, impacting outcomes in areas like appointments, reservations, insolvency, and demolitions. This blog post analyzes key cases from search results, explaining their significance for transparency, accountability, and legal compliance. Note: This is general information based on public judgments; consult a legal professional for specific advice.


Key Cases Highlighting 'No Further Information' in Aug 2019 Contexts


1. UGC Regulations and Vice Chancellor Appointments


One prominent case involved a challenge to the Vice Chancellor's appointment at Sardar Patel University. The Supreme Court found the appointment violated University Grants Commission Regulations, 2010, specifically Regulation 7.3.0, due to unmet eligibility like 10-year professor experience. The court issued a writ of quo warranto, quashing the notification dated 29.08.2019 Gambhirdan K Gadhvi VS State of Gujarat - 2022 Supreme(SC) 195.



  • Court urged Gujarat to amend statutes for federal alignment.

  • Emphasized public office standards for competence and integrity.

  • Key quote: Court did not interfere with the appointment of respondent No. 4 and vide order dated 30.07.2019 disposed of the same; however, this – noting incomplete follow-up, akin to 'no further information.'


This underscores states' duty to ensure accountability in educational appointments, preventing arbitrary decisions.


2. Policy Decisions in Service Commissions


In a Constitution of India Article 32 & 142 case on Women SSC Officers (WSSCO), the court addressed absorption claims. It held policy decisions on manpower, like not offering Permanent Commission (PC) to Short Service Commissioned officers, non-interferable Nitisha VS Union of India - 2021 Supreme(SC) 166.



  • Delhi High Court judgment upheld entitlements but claims for restricted areas unsustainable.

  • 'Dying cadre' referenced in service jurisprudence for dwindling officer classes.

  • One-time benefit extended under Article 142 for specific batches.


'No further information' vibe here from constrained party disclosures: Court, as a consequence of constraint of information being provided to it by the parties... was not alive to full extent.


3. Perjury, Forgery, and CrPC Section 195


A case on false evidence under IPC Sections 191-192 involved quashed-then-reinstated complaints. The Supreme Court clarified CrPC Section 195(1)(b)(i) vs (ii) distinctions, stressing offences 'in relation to' court proceedings Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. VS Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc. - 2020 4 Supreme 582.



  • Forgery must involve custodia legis documents for Section 195(1)(b)(ii).

  • Debit notes not qualifying as forgery under IPC 463/464.

  • Result: Complaints reinstated for Section 340 drill.


Phrase match: Even though allegedly serious offences... yet complaints themselves have now been quashed – Complaints reinstated... so that they may be proceeded with further.


4. Reservation Policies and Merit in Employment


Reservation disputes emphasized merit priority: Reserved candidates qualifying for general posts treated as unreserved Airport Authority Of India VS Sham Krishna B - 2026 Supreme(SC) 73.



  • Upheld model roster from Dept. of Personnel (1997).

  • No grounds to disrupt selection based on erroneous High Court views.

  • Info furnished: 122 candidates... unreserved, while only 10...


Ties to Aug 2019 via timelines like letters dated 18.07.2016, but echoes 'no further details' in select lists.


5. Debarment, Natural Justice, and Contracts


A transformer supplier's debarment challenged for storm delays. Court set aside orders for inadequate show-cause notice on penalties, violating natural justice Isolators and Isolators through its Proprietor Mrs. Sandhya Mishra VS Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(SC) 373.



  • Notice failed to specify penalties.

  • Aug 2019 links: Supplies due by 22 Aug 2019; info on 18.09.2019.

  • Quote: such information was furnished within 15 days...


6. Motor Vehicles Act Licensing


LMV license holders can drive transport vehicles under 7,500 kg GVW, per harmonious construction Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Rambha Devi - 2024 8 Supreme 577. No separate endorsement needed for light vehicles.



  • Welfare legislation for road safety and compensation.

  • Aug 2019 indirect: Evolving tech like driverless vehicles noted.


7. Demolitions and Rule of Law


Supreme Court guidelines against arbitrary demolitions of accused properties In Re: Directions in the matter of Demolition of Structures VS . - 2025 3 Supreme 47.



  • Mandatory prior show-cause notice (15 days min).

  • Video-graph proceedings; no collective punishment.

  • Article 142 directions circulated to states.


'No further information': Owner gets 4 weeks for info.


Other Notable Aug 2019 References



Pattern: 'Aug 2019 no further information reported' often marks procedural pauses, incomplete disclosures, or unresolved details, triggering court interventions for fairness.


Implications for Legal Practice and Compliance


These cases highlight:
- Transparency mandates: Courts demand full info; gaps lead to quashing (e.g., appointments, debarments).
- Natural justice: Prior notice, hearings essential.
- Policy deference: But only if reasoned; merit trumps in reservations.
- RTI limits: Privacy, sub-judice exemptions apply.


In insolvency/claims, RPs verify based on available data – expired docs mean reductions.


Key Takeaways



  • 'No further information' typically flags evidentiary shortfalls, prompting writs or reinstatements.

  • Aug 2019 recurs in timelines (notifications, dues, demolitions), showing real-world anchors.

  • General lesson: Proactively provide complete details to avoid adverse rulings.


This analysis draws from judgments; outcomes vary by facts. For personalized guidance, seek qualified legal counsel.


Search Results for "Aug 2019 No Further Information Reported: Legal Insights"

Gambhirdan K Gadhvi VS State of Gujarat - 2022 Supreme(SC) 195

2022 0 Supreme(SC) 195 India - Supreme Court

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA

The Court further urged the Gujarat government to amend local statutes to align with federal requirements and limit arbitrary appointments ... Secretary to Government, Information and Tourism Department and Ors, (2009) 4 SCC 590 and Kalyani Mathivanan Vs. K.V. ... and set aside the notification dated 29.08.2019, bearing No. ... Court did not interfere with the appointment of respondent No. 4 and vide order dated 30.07.2019 disposed of the same; however, this

Nitisha VS Union of India - 2021 Supreme(SC) 166

2021 0 Supreme(SC) 166 India - Supreme Court

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, M R SHAH

management exercises is a policy decision which is not required to be interfered with – Held, Court, as a consequence of constraint of information ... Topper of Geographic information officers course. ... The reasons and justification were to be communicated along with the pen picture to the officer reported upon. ... ‘A’ grading in Geographic and Information and remote sensing course from CDAC Pune in 2004.

Bandekar Brothers Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc.  Etc.  - 2020 4 Supreme 582

2020 4 Supreme 582 India - Supreme Court

yet complaints themselves have now been quashed – Complaints reinstated in their original form so that they may be proceeded with further ... After the Accused No.2 to 10 abovenamed were brought on record in the said 5 suits in Aug. ... Section 177 IPC deals with an offence furnishing false information. Section 181 IPC deals with false statement on oath. ... Section 182 IPC deals with false information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another

Airport Authority Of India VS Sham Krishna B - 2026 Supreme(SC) 73

2026 0 Supreme(SC) 73 India - Supreme Court

M. M. SUNDRESH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

The court found no grounds to uphold the High Court's decision that would have disrupted the selection process based on erroneous ... The information so furnished revealed that 122 candidates were selected under the unreserved category, while only 10 candidates were ... He has further argued that a large number of OBC/SC/ST vacancies are available in the Department and the vacancies advertised for ... In response, he was furnished with the select list along with mark details by a letter dated 18.07.2016....

Isolators and Isolators through its Proprietor Mrs.  Sandhya Mishra VS Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co.  Ltd.  - 2023 Supreme(SC) 373

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 373 India - Supreme Court

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR

such information was furnished within 15 days, as required by the terms of the contract. ... which had to be supplied within 6 months from the date of purchase order i.e. on or before 22 August, 2019. ... Fact of the matter further remains that on 18.09.2019, the respondent No. 2 dealing with the procurement specifically informed the

Malini Reddy vs H M Malleshappa - 2025 Supreme(Kar) 1894

2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 1894 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

V. SRISHANANDA

Burden of proof - The onus is on the defendants to prove non-service or payment inconsistencies, which they failed to discharge - No ... Further, as could be seen from Ex. D1, demand was upto August 2019 and payment under Ex. D3 is only upto June 2019. ... Admittedly, in ExD3 except signature of DW1 no further particulars are forthcoming as to when those amounts were paid and proof thereof ... was due of Rs.94,000/- from May 2019 to....

Support India Welfare Society VS State of U P - 2019 Supreme(All) 2566

2019 0 Supreme(All) 2566 India - Allahabad

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH BAGHEL, PIYUSH AGRAWAL

wash-room is mentioned, but no further information has been furnished to this Court whether the pond has been restored to its original ... Only after filing of this Public Interest Litigation, a demolition has been carried out on 26th August, 2019. ... Coming back to this case, we find that the demolition has been made on 26th August, 2019, in which five rooms, one Office and one

Smaaash Entertainment Private Limited vs Shripal Sevantilal Morakhia - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 6140

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 6140 India - National Company Law Tribunal

Sh. Hariharan Neelakanta Iyer, Member (Technical), Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial)

... ... Findings of Court: ... Prima facie view held that the Respondents are concealing information regarding the Corporate Debtor ... Respondents affirmed that they had provided all information and documents in their possession and have no further details to provide ... Further, the RP made no efforts to independently obtain the relevant information about the Corporate Debtor despite a large part ... It is submitted in IA/ 2430/2023, the RP sough....

Axis Bank Limited vs Reliance Communication Limited - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3542

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3542 India - National Company Law Tribunal

Prabhat Kumar, Member (Technical), V.G. Bisht, Member (Judicial)

the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, with the obligations of the Resolution Professional to inspect validity based on available information ... additional information and/or circumstances warranted the same. ... additional information and/or change of circumstances warranting revision. ... The revision here can be downward or upward as the additional information warrants.

Mooman Jafferali Aliji Maknojiya VS Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj

India - Current Civil Cases

J.B.PARDIWALA, VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI

However, no further details were provided by the said Trustees with regard to such registration. ... Golcha Properties Private Limited, reported in (1970) 3 SCC 573. ... Automobile Association, reported in AIR 1949 Bombay 141, and the English practice on which that decision is based.

SUNNY JACOB CHERIAN @ SUNNY JACOB CHERIAN JOLLIS SUNNY JACOB vs CREDIT INFORMATION BUREAU (INDIA) LTD - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9261

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9261 India - High Court of Kerala

GOPINATH P, J

As stated in the counter affidavit, this respondent being only a repository of information, can only act as per the information provided by its member institutions. ... (ii) Bank of Baroda account # 74800600001972 was reported with "Sub-Standard” Days Past Dues ("DPD's") along with amount overdue from Jun-2022 to Aug-2022. ... The said account was also reported with increasing current balance from Dec-2021 to April-2022 along with constant current balance of Rs. 4,45,566/- from May-2022 to Aug....

Siddharth Joshi vs Indian Institute of Management  Bangalore - 2022 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6347

2022 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6347 India - Central Information Commission

" pos_top="190.79612659999987">“Please provide a date and time when I can come and inspect all files related to the subject of reservations in faculty recruitment between the period Aug 2019 and January 2020.” ... The Respondent submitted that they have provided the Appellant an opportunity of inspection of the file related to the subject of reservations in faculty recruitment between the period Aug 2019 and January 2020, as available in their records, on 08.02.2021 and the delay in providing the same occurred ... The Co....

Santosh Kumar Mishra vs Indian Air Force - 2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6028

2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 6028 India - Central Information Commission

Jan 2019 to 31 Dec 2019, issue of fresh corrigendum PPO and payment of due arrears within a period of 04 months. ... RT236197319IN dated 26 Aug 2023, which was delivered to DAV on 29 Aug 2023. ... Dec 2019 fresh corrigendum PPO and payment of due arrears within a period of 04 months. ... The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 19.06.2024 (online) seeking the following information:“The Honourable AFT (PB) New Delhi in its decision dated 02 Jan 2023 has 3055/2022 and granted a notio....

Thirunarayan Lokanath vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation - 2022 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 9431

2022 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 9431 India - Central Information Commission

This is reported in previous RTI which was transferred to this office. ... Whether all the options for Reason for exit were available between the period from 1 Aug 2018 to 3 Aug 2020 in relevant EPFO portal for all employers under the jurisdiction of RO, Hyderabad (Madhapur)5) What is the reason / Rationale behind settling my PF account APHYD15056280000010093 (linked with this UAN 101134112504) without providing the remainder back PF wages (of 2018 and 2019 ... left_margin="175.19994000000008" pos_bottom="278.26142660000....

MAJ. GEN. GAURAB ROY vs Directorate General of Quality Assurance - 2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 1355

2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 1355 India - Central Information Commission

(c) In Aug 2019, Brig Ahooja filed a complaint in the court of XI ACMM Secunderabad against the then Brig Gourab Roy. xxx 9. As the matter is sub-judice at present, the information sought by the appellant cannot be provided under Section 8(1)(h). ... Some relevant records/documents has already been provided to the applicant vide CPIO letter dated 22 Aug 2022 and 31 Aug 2022. 10. ... d) A copy of all documents received from the court of XI ACMM, Secunderabad to include initial informa....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top