AI Overview

AI Overview...

#PMAYGuidelines, #AffordableHousing, #SlumRehabilitation

PMAY Guidelines for Housing Development on Government Land


The Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) is a flagship government initiative aimed at providing affordable housing to urban and rural poor, including slum dwellers. A common question arises: what are the guidelines for housing development on government land through PMAY scheme? This blog explores legal precedents, eligibility criteria, eviction processes, and court interpretations to clarify how PMAY applies to government-owned land, drawing from key judgments.


While PMAY promotes welfare, courts emphasize that long-term possession does not confer ownership, and statutory procedures must be followed. This post synthesizes insights from recent cases for a comprehensive understanding. Note: This is general information based on public judgments and not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for personalized guidance.


Understanding PMAY and Its Objectives


PMAY, launched under the 'Housing for All' mission, has urban (PMAY-U) and rural (PMAY-G) components. It targets Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), Low-Income Groups (LIG), and slum dwellers through subsidies, rehabilitation, and affordable rentals.



Government land often becomes central in slum redevelopment or encroachment cases. Schemes like Odisha Land Rights to Slum Dwellers Act, 2017, integrate with PMAY to uplift dwellers via planned housing. However, courts consistently rule that encroachments on public land cannot be regularized automatically. Khetrabasi Behera vs State of Odisha - 2025 Supreme(Ori) 384


Legal Framework for Development on Government Land


Slum Rehabilitation and Eviction Rules


Courts balance Article 21 rights (right to life and shelter) with public interest. Long possession does not legitimize illegal occupation, but fair eviction processes are mandated.


In a key Odisha case, petitioners contested eviction without notice, seeking PMAY recognition. The court held: Long-term possession of public land does not confer legal ownership; statutory frameworks for rehabilitation must be followed. Petitions were dismissed, upholding eviction aligned with the 2017 Act and PMAY objectives. Khetrabasi Behera vs State of Odisha - 2025 Supreme(Ori) 384


Similarly, in Gujarat, a PIL against evicting slum dwellers (J.P. Ni Chali) was dismissed as meritless. The court noted: Court cannot compel State authorities to apply scheme... such persons being represented by petitioner not residing in such land. Authorities were advised to consider claims sympathetically under other policies. Bandhkaam Mazdoor Sangathan VS State Of Gujarat - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 330


Key guidelines from cases:
- Evictions require statutory notices and procedural fairness.
- Rehabilitation under PMAY is possible but not a vested right for encroachers.
- Slum dwellers pre-2010 may qualify if verified, but post-cutoff encroachers often do not. 01400034204


Land Use and Allotment Restrictions


Development on specific government lands, like Gairan land or pooled land, faces scrutiny. In Maharashtra, allotment for PMAY projects was upheld despite Section 22A prohibitions under MLRC, as development plans override prior designations. The court affirmed: Development Plans sanctioned by State override previous land use. SANTOSH MADHUKAR BHONDVE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 7836


Contrastingly, in Andhra Pradesh, allotting pooled land house sites under CRDA Act for EWS was suspended. Section 53(1)(d) reserves 5% for affordable housing (built-up units), not open plots. The State Government does not have the power to alienate the land pooled under the Land Pooling Scheme. G. Hari Govinda Prasad VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 Supreme(AP) 767


Eligibility and Beneficiary Selection Under PMAY


Strict verification ensures benefits reach genuine applicants. Courts intervene against irregularities but uphold guidelines.



In multiple writs, courts directed Block Development Officers (BDOs) to sanction houses for enrolled beneficiaries: Eligibility for housing under PMAY scheme establishes a right, necessitating action by authorities. Rita Bhoi vs State of Odisha - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 520 Puspa Bhoi vs State of Odisha - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 521


For slum encroachers on railway or government land, courts ordered non-discriminatory inclusion in housing lists: Respondents No. 5 and 8 will not make any discrimination amongst encroachers... and to allot houses as and when available. BHANWAR SEN MOGARE VS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF RAILWAY NEW DELHI (INDIA) (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS NAYA RAIPUR - 2019 Supreme(Chh) 1010


PMAY-G Specifics: Beneficiaries must lack adequate housing; funds misappropriation or mapping errors warrant fresh consideration in next phases. Prafulla Nath S/o Late Sri Sangsing Nath vs Union Of India - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 127


Speculative vs. Genuine Homebuyers


IBC amendments protect genuine PMAY allottees from speculative investors: Intent to protect genuine homebuyers against speculative investors underscored. Thresholds apply collectively. Mansi Brar Fernandes VS Shubha Sharma - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1681


Court Interventions and Public Interest


Courts exercise Article 226 writ jurisdiction sparingly but direct compliance:


| Case Theme | Court Direction | Reference |
|------------|-----------------|-----------|
| Beneficiary Lists | Set aside irregular lists; re-assess per G.O. guidelines | AinalaLaxshmamma vs State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 132 |
| JNNURM Flats | Expedite allotment for EWS/slum rehab; provide amenities | In Re : Housing For The Poor In Delhi VS . - 2022 Supreme(Del) 868 |
| Scheme Guidelines Challenge | Dismissed; guidelines not violative of Article 19(1)(e) | Sanjay Kumar VS Union Of India - 2020 Supreme(All) 1075 |
| Irregular Allotments | Verify eligibility; comply with PMAY framework | G.PUSHPARAJ vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21504 |


Right to shelter stems from Articles 19(1)(e) and 21, but no absolute right to public land. States must provide alternatives, like using Land Ceiling Act lands. 01400034204


Challenges and Best Practices



  • Administrative Delays: Courts mandate timely action post-verification.

  • Encroachment Rehab: Prioritize pre-existing dwellers; integrate with PMAY-U.

  • Land Pooling: Limit to built housing, not plots.


Guidelines evolve; PMAY integrates with state acts like Delhi Slum Policy or Gujarat Slum Act. Saraswati Devi Vs The State SHABNAM BURNEY Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 1098


Key Takeaways



  1. No Automatic Ownership: Encroachments on government land require statutory rehab, not regularization. Khetrabasi Behera vs State of Odisha - 2025 Supreme(Ori) 384

  2. Strict Eligibility: Verify via surveys, documents; prioritize genuine poor. Dhaneswar Bhoi vs State of Odisha - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 519

  3. Fair Process: Article 21 mandates notice in evictions; PMAY offers pathways.

  4. Court Role: Directs inclusion/compliance but respects policy discretion.

  5. State Duty: Formulate uniform policies for shelter, aligning with PMAY.


PMAY on government land promotes welfare but hinges on legal compliance. Stay updated via official portals and seek expert advice for applications.


Disclaimer: Legal outcomes vary by facts and jurisdiction. This analysis draws from cited judgments for educational purposes.


Search Results for "PMAY Guidelines for Housing on Government Land"

Khetrabasi Behera vs State of Odisha - 2025 Supreme(Ori) 384

2025 0 Supreme(Ori) 384 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Odisha Land Rights to Slum Dwellers Act, 2017 - Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana - Petitioners ... They seek recognition under state housing schemes promoting welfare for slum dwellers. ... Court acknowledges housing schemes under the 2017 Act aim to uplift slum dwellers. ... Units under the Pradhan Mantri #HL....

Mansi Brar Fernandes VS Shubha Sharma - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1681

2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1681 India - Supreme Court

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN

(Paras 18.4.5, 19.5) ... ... (C) Legal Interpretation of 'speculative trading' in residential real estate contracts ... Amendments to IBC - Intent to protect genuine homebuyers against speculative investors underscored - Statutory threshold requirements for ... Indeed, various welfare schemes such as the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) have been initiated by the Government to provide affordable ... Unsold inventory from such pro....

Bandhkaam Mazdoor Sangathan VS State Of Gujarat - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 330

2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 330 India - Gujarat

ARAVIND KUMAR, ASHUTOSH J.SHASTRI

and such persons being represented by petitioner not residing in such land, Court cannot compel State authorities to apply scheme ... - Evicting Slum Dwellers - Petitioner by way of this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India in name of Public Interest ... parting with present order, Court may make it clear that it would be open for petitioner to avail any other remedy to ventilate ... a separate policy or separate category in Pradhan Mantri Awa....

AJAY MAKEN & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

India - Delhi High Court

See, “Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana: Housing for All (Urban)”, Scheme Guidelines 59 The „Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana‟ (PMAY ... of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna.

Saraswati Devi Vs The State

India - Patna High Court

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

>Slum Rehabilitation Housing Policy, 2017 (Revised) or under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Urban) (PMAY-U)- Housing ... Urban Development and Housing Department through its Principal Secretary, Government ... p>rehabilitation under any scheme of the Central Government or the State Government or right to shelter

Khetrabasi Behera vs State of Odisha

2025 0 Supreme(Ori) 384 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Odisha Land Rights to Slum Dwellers Act, 2017 - Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana - Petitioners ... They seek recognition under state housing schemes promoting welfare for slum dwellers. ... Court acknowledges housing schemes under the 2017 Act aim to uplift slum dwellers. ... Units under the Pradhan Mantri Awas#HL_END....

G.PUSHPARAJ vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21504

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21504 India - High Court of Madras

Honourable Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

housing schemes including PMAY. ... various schemes, emphasizing the legal framework provided by PMAY and evaluating the actions of authorities in light of eligibility ... and procedural requirements for housing allotments. ... housing scheme, where each housing scheme is implemented depending upon the demand and need of the public. ... scheme,....

Sanjay Kumar VS Union Of India - 2020 Supreme(All) 1075

2020 0 Supreme(All) 1075 India - Allahabad

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

contained under the Scheme Guidelines notified by the respondent no. 1 under the Pradhan Mantri Awas YojanaHousing for All (Urban ... The objective of the Scheme and Guidelines provided therefor being clearly with a view to address the objective of creating housing ... , the Scheme Guidelines can in no manner be said to be contrary to public....

G.  Hari Govinda Prasad VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 Supreme(AP) 767

2020 0 Supreme(AP) 767 India - Andhra Pradesh

J.K.MAHESHWARI, AKULA VENKATA SESHA SAI, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Scheme Rules, 2015 and Land Allotment Regulations, 2017. 2. ... Whether the State Government has the power to alienate the land pooled under the Land Pooling Scheme? 3. ... five percent of total area of the scheme for providing affordable housing for the poor or social housing for economically weaker ... The Ministry of #HL_ST....

AinalaLaxshmamma vs State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 132

2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 132 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

K.LAKSHMAN

(Paras 4, 16) ... ... (B) Public Interest - Courts have the authority to intervene when government ... 2 BHK houses under the government's housing policy, but a list of beneficiaries was released favoring residents outside their area ... for 2 BHK houses, claiming it violated the guidelines established. ... Vide G.O.Ms.No.12, dated 26.11.2015, the Government has issued amended guidelines for implementation #HL_ST....

Khetrabasi Behera vs State of Odisha

2025 0 Supreme(Ori) 384 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

Yojana (PMAY), which is in consonance with the applicable guidelines of the scheme. ... Under PMAY, the financial contribution of the Central Government is statutorily limited to a maximum of Rs. 1.5 lakhs per dwelling unit, and the provision of such housing is contingent upon compliance with the modalities contemplated under the scheme. ... requisite eligibility norms, to extend to them the benefit of housing assistance under the PMAY#HL_E....

Prafulla Nath S/o Late Sri Sangsing Nath vs Union Of India

2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 127 India - THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

MANISH CHOUDHURY

It is the case of the petitioners that they are eligible to receive the benefits of affordable housing under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin [PMAY-G] Scheme launched by the Central Government. ... The next phase of PMAY-G Scheme would be carried during the period : Financial Year : 2024 – 2025 to Financial Year : 2028-2029. The Central Government, on 09.08.2024, has approved the implementation of the PMAY-G Scheme for five ....

Puspa Bhoi vs State of Odisha - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 521

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 521 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

No.3) for the sanction of a house under Rural Housing, PMAY Scheme in favour of the Petitioner, as the Petitioner is entitled to get the same as per the criterias of that PMAY scheme. ... No.3) is directed to take the required steps i.e. the steps subsequent to the enrollment of name under PMAY scheme for the sanction of a house in favour of the Petitioner in that PMAY Scheme as per its guidelines as expeditiously ....

Rita Bhoi vs State of Odisha - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 520

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 520 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

No.3) for the sanction of a house under Rural Housing, PMAY Scheme in favour of the Petitioner, as the Petitioner is entitled to get the same as per the criterias of that PMAY scheme. ... No.3) is directed to take the required steps i.e. the steps subsequent to the enrollment of name under PMAY scheme for the sanction of a house in favour of the Petitioner in that PMAY Scheme as per its guidelines as expeditiously ....

Krushna Chadra Das VS State of Odisha - 2023 Supreme(Ori) 138

2023 0 Supreme(Ori) 138 India - Orissa

ARINDAM SINHA

In paragraph 6 of the petition there is assertion, inter alia, that after due verification made by the sub-ordinate officer deputed by the Block Development Officer (BDO), Narsinghpur, it was found that petitioners are entitled to be beneficiaries for allotment under the housing scheme. ... Parties to make verification afresh in presence of the petitioners and if the petitioners are being found suitable in the process of fresh verification as per the guidelines of the PMAY (G), their cases shall be cons....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top