Chakradharamahanthi Vekata Maikya Prasuna vs Chakradharamahanthi Vekata Ramana Murthy

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(AP) 869

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Chakradharamahanthi Vekata Maikya Prasuna – Appellant
Versus
Chakradharamahanthi Vekata Ramana Murthy – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. G. Chandra Shekhar Rao, Vedula Srinivas, N. Jayasurya, Sunitha Nawandar, N. Krishna Sumanth, N. Aswartha Narayana, T. Prasanna Kumar, Mangena Sree Rama Rao, Srinivasa Rao Pappu, P. Suhasini Reddy, Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, K. Venumadhav, A.K. Kishore Reddy, Subba Rao Posani, I. Gopal Reddy, G. Rama Manoja, Ganga Kumar Chakravartula, M.M.M. Srinivasa Rao, Pushadapu Subba Rao, Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, Sreenivasa Rao Ravulapati, P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, D.L. Pandu, Dhanunjaya Reddy, V. Rajagopal Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondent:M/s. Kowturu Pavan Kumar, Nageshwar Rao Pujari, Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, S. Lakshmi Kanth, G.R. Sudhakar, Venkateswara Rao Manda, Pushadapu Subba Rao. C.A.R. Seshagiri Rao, Sriman, V.V.L.N. Sarma, J. Sreenivasa Rao, Tangeda Dayananda Rao, A.K. Kishore Reddy, Kiran Palakurthi, D. Venkata Ramana, VGopala Rao Amancharla, D.L. Pandu, P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, G. Sravan Kumar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. All these Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short “CPC”) to withdraw the Original Petitions pending on the file of different Courts shown in column No.2 and transfer the same to the Courts shown in Column No.3, on the ground mentioned in Column No.4 of the table given hereunder.

S No	Transfer OP No.	Court where petition is pending – Court where petition is to be transferred	Transfer Petition by the wife or husband	Relief claimed in petition sought to be transferred	Ground for seeking Transfer
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)
1	809/2016	FCOPNo.82/2016 From Family Court, Visakhapatnam To Family Judge, Srikakulam	Wife-Petitioner	Dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce under Sec.13(1)(ib) Hindu Marriage Act.	* No male assistance for me to travel more than 120Km. * Threat to life at the hands of the Respondent at Visakhapatnam. * Petitioner file Dowry harassment and restitution of conjugal rights cases at Srikakulam, hence the present

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 Supreme(AP) 869

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYChakradharamahanthi Vekata Maikya Prasuna – AppellantVersusChakradharamahanthi Vekata Ramana Murthy – Respondent

Cases Referred (44)

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Chakradharamahanthi Vekata Maikya Prasuna – Appellant
Versus
Chakradharamahanthi Vekata Ramana Murthy – Respondent