M. NAGAPRASANNA
Govindaraja, S/o Lakshminarayana Achar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in Crime No.1 of 2021 registered against the petitioner for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 464, 472 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Adumbrated in brief, the factual background as projected by the petitioner is as follows:
There are three protagonists in the alleged episode of crime 3rd-the 2nd respondent/complainant-representative of the respondent; accused No.2 Nikat Capital, and the petitioner. According to the 2nd respondent who is the Additional Deputy General Manager of the 3rd respondent, the story twined unfolds this way. One Nikat Capital, a company based in the United Kingdom having its office in London was introduced by the petitioner to the complainant through his Director Saimak Vatanabadi. It appears that certain transactions took place between the complainant and Nikat Capital. An international sales contract was executed between Nikat Capital and the 3rd respondent for shipping of 6000 metric tons of Heavy Melting Scrap (HMS) and an amount of 7,35,000 US dollars was transferred from the account of 3rd respondent to Nikat Capital despite the fact there was short sup
Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary [(1992) 4 SCC 305 : 1993 SCC (Cri) 36]
Chirag M. Pathak v. Dollyben Kantilal patel
CBI v. Ravi Shankar Srivastava [(2006) 7 SCC 188 : (2006) 3 SCC (Cri) 233]
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel v. The State of Gujarat reported in (2018) 3 SCC 104
G. Sagar Suri v. State of U.P. [(2000) 2 SCC 636 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 513]
Hamida v. Rashid [(2008) 1 SCC 474 (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 234]
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd. [(2006) 6 SCC 736 : (2006) 3 SCC (Cri) 188
Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal
KAMAL SHIVAJI POKARNEKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS - (2019)14 SCC 350
Mohd. Ibrahim v. State of Bihar [(2009) 8 SCC 751 : (2009) 3 SCC (Cri) 929]
MANOJ MAHAVIR PRASAD KHAITAN V. RAM GOPAL PODDAR
MedMeme LLC v. IHORSE BPO Solutions (P) Ltd., 2014 SCC OnLine Mad 12832 : (2015) 2 MWN (Cri) 97]
NITYA DHARMANANDA V. GOPAL SHEELUM REDDY reported in (2018)2 SCC 93
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra
R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta [(2009) 1 SCC 516 : (2009) 1 SCC (Cri) 567]
RUKMINI NARVEKAR v. VIJAYA SATARDEKAR AND OTHERS - AIR 2009 SC 1013
Rajesh Bajaj v. State (NCT of Delhi) [(1999) 3 SCC 259 : 1999 SCC (Cri) 401 : AIR 1999 SC 1216]
Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar [AIR 1964 SC 1 : (1964) 1 Cri LJ 1]
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
State of Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa
STATE OF ORISSA V. DEBENDRA NATH PADHI
State of Orissa v. Saroj Kumar Sahoo [(2005) 13 SCC 540 : (2006) 2 SCC (Cri) 272]
V.Y. Jose and another v. State of Gujarat and another reported in (2009) 3 SCC 78
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.