SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 146

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Harpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Rana Vikram Singh, Saket Tiwary (in 60841).
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP (in 60841).

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J. – Heard Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Both aforesaid petitions preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the “Cr.P.C.”) for quashing the order dated 29.04.2024 passed in connection with Complaint Case No. 13373(C) of 2014, whereby learned Magistrate has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 166, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short the “I.P.C.”) and issued summon to all the accused persons including the petitioner(s).

3. The brief case of the prosecution, as it appears from complaint petition, is that a one day ‘Begusarai Bandh’ was called for by the ‘Aparadh Virodhi Sangharsh Samiti’ on 28.03.2014, as to protest the occurrence of kidnapping of three childrens in Begusarai and killing of one child namely, Piyush after his kidnapping. The aforesaid ‘Bandh/strike’ claimed to be supported by the civil societies and business organizations beside two district advocate associations of Begusarai also by getting themselves away from the court work. It appears fro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top