Back
AMIT SHARMA
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Netrapal Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution's arguments supporting evidence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. importance of proving demand and acceptance in corruption cases. (Para 8) |
| 4. discussion on the admissibility of evidence in court. (Para 11) |
| 5. legal principles relevant to appeal against acquittal. (Para 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's review of admissibility and credibility of evidence. (Para 19 , 20 , 23) |
| 7. conclusion on evidence not supporting prosecution's case. (Para 27 , 28 , 30) |
| 8. final judgment on the appeal. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Sharma, J. - The present appeal under Section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('CrPC') has been preferred by the State against judgment dated 12.08.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge (PC Act) - 05 (ACB), (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Corruption Case No. 20/2013 arising out of FIR No. 383/2007 registered at PS Dabri. Vide the impugned judgment dated 12.08.2015, the learned Special Judge has acquitted the respondents of charges under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('PC Act') punishable under Section 13 (2) of the said Act.
2. Briefly stated, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
