SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
PPS International – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: Mr. Pavan Kumar Agarwal, In person
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Vakul Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Mr. Pavan Kumar Agarwal, the proprietor, in person, for the complainant and Mr. Vakul Sharma, Advocate, for the opposite party.

2. PPS International has filed above complaint for directing the opposite party to pay (i) Rs.11300000/- along with interest @18% per annum from the date of loss till the date of actual payment, (ii) Rs.2/- crores, as compensation for loss of business, mental agony and harassment, and (iii) to cost of litigation.

3. The facts as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it are as follows:—

(a) Pavan Kumar Agarwal (sole proprietor of the complainant) did Engineering (Mechanical) from Aligarh Muslim University, in 1988 and MBA from IMT Ghaziabad in 1993. After working for 15 years in different Engineering Industry, mainly dealing with Indian Railways, Pavan Kumar Agarwal set up an agency and trading business from 01.08.2003 and established three companies, namely (i) PPS International, (ii) SIM International and (iii) PT Communication System Pvt. Ltd. (a Joint Venture with a Belgium Company). The complainant was engaged in dealing with foreign companies to sell and to provide after sale service in India for their very h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top