RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
PPS International – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. Pavan Kumar Agarwal, the proprietor, in person, for the complainant and Mr. Vakul Sharma, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. PPS International has filed above complaint for directing the opposite party to pay (i) Rs.11300000/- along with interest @18% per annum from the date of loss till the date of actual payment, (ii) Rs.2/- crores, as compensation for loss of business, mental agony and harassment, and (iii) to cost of litigation.
3. The facts as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it are as follows:—
(a) Pavan Kumar Agarwal (sole proprietor of the complainant) did Engineering (Mechanical) from Aligarh Muslim University, in 1988 and MBA from IMT Ghaziabad in 1993. After working for 15 years in different Engineering Industry, mainly dealing with Indian Railways, Pavan Kumar Agarwal set up an agency and trading business from 01.08.2003 and established three companies, namely (i) PPS International, (ii) SIM International and (iii) PT Communication System Pvt. Ltd. (a Joint Venture with a Belgium Company). The complainant was engaged in dealing with foreign companies to sell and to provide after sale service in India for their very h
Laxmi Engineering Works vs. P.S.G. Industrial Institute
“Generating livelihood by means of self-employment” - If the dominant purpose behind purchasing the good or service was for the personal use and consumption of the purchaser and or their beneficiary ....
A corporate entity's status as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act depends on the intent behind the transaction rather than the entity's commercial nature; allegations of fraud must be resol....
When a person avails a service for a commercial purpose, to come within meaning of ‘consumer’ as defined in C.P. Act, he will have to establish that services were availed exclusively for the purposes....
Commercial transactions do not qualify for consumer protection under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Bank extending financial facility for commercial venture & business to business transaction with profit generation as dominant purpose – Consumer Forum is not available to Complainant.
Consumer – Borrower of a project loan does not fall within definition of ‘Consumer’ under provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Legal Title - The legal title of the complainant does stand compromised on account of the loss of the original documents by opposite party 1.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.