ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Trikambhai Mohanbhai Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present Appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order in Special Case No. 20 of 2005 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dhrangadhra dated 8.1.2008 recording the acquittal of the Respondents/Original Accused for the charges under Sections 504, 506(1) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “the Atrocities Act”).
2. The facts of the case briefly are that complainant – Chaturbhai Motibhai, who is residing at Soldivala, lodged a complaint before the Dhrangdhra Taluka Police Station being CR No. II-23/05, against the accused persons for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 504, 506(2) of IPC and Section 3(1)(10) of the Atrocities Act. The prosecution case is that on 10.4.2005, at about 22:00 hours, accused persons took the soil from the field of complainant and when complainant saw it and denied for the same, the accused persons got provoked and gave filthy abuses to the complainant and also threatened him to kill. The accused persons insulted him by giving filth
Narendra Singh v. State of M.P.
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P.
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao v. State of A.P.
K. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P.
K. Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala
Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar
Kuldeep Singh v. Commissioner of Police
Lalit Kumar and Ors. v. Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Govt. of W.B.
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Perla Somasekhara Reddy v. State of A.P.
Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Admn.
Ramesh Babulal Doshi v. State of Gujarat
S. Rama Krishna v. S. Rami Reddy
Shailendra Pratap v. State of U.P.
Shambhoo Missir v. State of Bihar
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran
State of U.P. v. Ram Veer Singh
The appellate court's power to review evidence in acquittal appeals is extensive but should be exercised cautiously, with due consideration to the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findi....
It is settled law that if main grounds on which lower Court has based its order acquitting accused are reasonable and plausible, and same cannot be entirely and effectively be dislodged or demolished....
The judgment emphasizes the need for compelling circumstances and the perversity of the lower court's decision to interfere with an order of acquittal, citing specific cases to support the legal prin....
The appellate court's power to review evidence in acquittal appeals is limited, and interference is justified only in exceptional cases with compelling circumstances and when the judgment under appea....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.