ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Nazmaben W/o Nasirbhai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present Appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order in Sessions Case No. 60 of 2005 by the learned Presiding Officer & Additional Sessions Judge, 6th Fast Track Court, Gondal, Camp at Jetpur dated 23.5.2007 recording acquittal for the charges under Sections 504, 506, 323, 114, 143, 147 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the Atrocities Act").
2. The facts of the case briefly are that the complainant Labhuben wife of Kalubhai Sitapara lodged complaint before Jetpur Police Station being I-CR No. 88 of 2005 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 504, 506, 323, 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(10) of the Atrocities Act. The case of the prosecution is that on 3.5.2005, at about 19:15 hours, complainant Labhuben wife of Kalubhai Sitapara, residing at Champrajpur, gave typed complaint at jetpur Taluka Police Station. The further case of the prosecution is that at about 4:00 pm, the complainant went to village reservoir for fetching drinking water, at that time Najmaben, Roshanben, Banuben case there and threw away
Aruvelu v. State (2009) 10 SCC 206
Atley v. State of U.P. AIR 1955 SC 807
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P.
Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar Khan and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Dhanapal v. State (2009) 10 SCC 401
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao v. State of A.P (2009) 10 SCC 636
Gaya Din v. Hanuman Prasad (2001) 1 SCC 501
K. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P. (1979) 1 SCC 355
K. Ramakrishnan Unnithan v. State of Kerala (1999) 3 SCC 309
Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar
Kuldeep Singh v. Commissioner of Police (1999) 2 SCC 10
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Narendra Singh v. State of M.P.
Perla Somasekhara Reddy v. State of A.P.
Rajesh Singh & Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Admn (1984) 4 SCC 635
Ramesh Babulal Doshi v. State of Gujarat (1996) 9 SCC 225
S. Rama Krishna v. S. Rami Reddy
Sambasivan v. State of Kerala (1998) 5 SCC 412
Shailendra Pratap v. State of U.P.
Shambhoo Missir v. State of Bihar
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran
State of U.P. v. Ram Veer Singh
Surajpal Singh v. State AIR 1952 SC 52; Wilayat Khan v. State of U.P AIR 1953 SC 122
It is settled law that if main grounds on which lower Court has based its order acquitting accused are reasonable and plausible, and same cannot be entirely and effectively be dislodged or demolished....
The appellate court's power to review evidence in acquittal appeals is extensive but should be exercised cautiously, with due consideration to the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findi....
Point of law : It is true that the High Court would not reverse an order of acquittal merely on formation of an opinion different than that of the trial Court. It is also trite in law that the High C....
The appellate court's power to review evidence in acquittal appeals is limited, and interference is justified only in exceptional cases with compelling circumstances and when the judgment under appea....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.