Back
SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Balaji – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge tamil nadu act 42 of 2017. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against legislation based on violation of constitutional rights. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents defend legislation based on evolving socio-economic conditions. (Para 4) |
| 4. disputes highlight complexity regarding legislative powers in rental laws. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. key legislative powers analyzed in context of constitutional frameworks. (Para 10 , 11 , 19) |
| 6. legislation remains valid with specified operational adjustments. (Para 20) |
ORDER :
(Hon'ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.)
(Prayer in W.P.No.3985 of 2020 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to amend or to include the indispensible guidelines of Building Plan Approval and in the TNRRRLT Act.)
The Petitions:
The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions are either tenants or landlords in respect of the buildings let out for residential or commercial purposes. They are challenging the constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) as amended. Various provision
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
