JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State-respondents.

2. Present petition has been filed for quashing the impugned orders dated 04.11.2009, 05.11.2009, 14.10.2020 & 18.04.2011 and for payment of consequential dues.

3. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, writ petition is being decided at the admission stage itself.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during pendency of writ petition, Raj Pal Singh (husband of petitioner) died and now petition is being contested by his wife after filing substitution application, which has been allowed.

5. He next submitted that husband of petitioner (Raj Pal Singh) was serving as Sub Inspector in Civil Police and after attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years, he was retired from service on 31.05.2009. While, he was posted at Ramabai Nagar, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against him to award major punishment and also withholding the salary for the period of his absence from duty. Pursuant to that, a charge sheet dated 24.10.2008 was served upon husband of petitioner and he has submitted his reply da