SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, N.TUKARAMJI
Komatireddy Janakiram Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:V.M. Krishna Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent: GP for Revenue TG

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ.—The present writ appeal is arising out of an order dated 08.11.2021, passed in W.P.No.19769 of 2021 by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant/petitioner.

2. The facts of the case reveal that the appellant/petitioner has filed the writ petition being aggrieved by an order passed by the Special Tribunal, Nalgonda in New Case No.F2/Spl.Tribunal/0264/2021 (Old Case No.F2/4244/ 2019), dated 10.07.2021 by which the order passed by the Special Tribunal in Old Case No.F2/4244/2019, dated 09.02.2021 was confirmed. The Special Tribunal by order dated 09.02.2021 has reversed the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated Nil.05.2019.

3. The facts further reveal that the appellant/petitioner came up before this Court stating that his father K. Sathi Reddy expired in the year 1970 and the appellant/petitioner, and his brother late K. Neela Reddy, who is the father of respondents 7, 9 and 10, have succeeded to the ancestral land to an extent of Acs.56.00 guntas spread over in survey Nos.143, 144, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 172, 175, 176, 187, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 201, 460 and 417 of Nomula Villag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top