SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2850

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
N.S. Krishnamoorthi and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 & & WMP. No.5474 of 2025
Decided On : 26-03-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. N. Manokaran, Mr. A. Parthasarathy, Mr. R. Sathishkumar, Mr. Vijayakumari Natarajan.
For the Respondents: Mr. Edwin Prabhakar, State GP assisted by Mr. A. Selvendran, SGP.

Grama natham lands occupied and recognized by the State confer private ownership to occupants, distinguishing them from unoccupied lands that vest with the State.

Headnote:(A) Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Grama Natham lands - The judgment addresses the issue of occupancy rights on grama natham lands, noting that where such lands are occupied and recognized by the State through successive transfers, they become the private property of the occupant, distinguishing them from unoccupied lands, which vest with the State. (Paras 48(i), 27, 28)

(B) Judicial Precedence - Principle of Stare Decisis - Court emphasizes the need to adhere to established precedents regarding occupancy rights on grama natham lands, highlighting the inconsistency of recent judgments that deviate from long-standing principles without proper justification. (Paras 36, 42)

(C) Ownership Concepts - For unoccupied grama natham lands, title vests with the State, enabling it to evict unauthorized occupants via the Act, while recognizing that persistent occupation may establish private ownership over time. (Paras 48(ii), 48(iv))

Facts of the case:
The petitioners are seeking the grant of patta for various parcels of land classified as grama natham, contending that they possess prior ownership rights based on historical occupation and legal recognition through previous grants. Multiple petitions were filed challenging the authorities' decisions to deny patta on various grounds, including administrative restrictions beyond three cents. (Paras 1-7)

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the petitions, ruling that the respondents should issue patta to petitioners residing on grama natham land for an extended duration, asserting that restrictions applicable to unoccupied natham do not apply to recognized occupied natham lands. (Paras 49, 50)

Issues: The principal issues revolved around whether the occupancy of grama natham lands confers ownership rights, the legality of administrative limits on patta issuance, and the necessity for adherence to judicial precedents regarding property rights. (Paras 4, 49)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that laws governing grama natham lands necessitate adherence to established judicial principles, asserting that occupied lands, when recognized, cannot be treated as government property, thereby reaffirming the rights of recognized occupants to seek patta without undue restrictions. (Paras 48-50)

Result: The writ petitions were allowed, instructing the authorities to grant patta to the eligible petitioners. (Paras 49, 50)

Table of Content
1. grant of patta for grama natham lands is validated by historical occupancy. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of property ownership (Para 3)
3. petitioners' entitlement to grama natham lands (Para 4)
4. state ownership and rights over lands (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 28)
5. distinction between occupied and unoccupied grama natham (Para 18 , 30 , 34 , 36)
6. legal standing of occupied grama natham lands (Para 42)
7. conclusions on grama natham land rights (Para 48)
8. final directives regarding patta issuance (Para 49 , 50)

ORDER :

(N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.)

The issue involved in all these writ petitions pertains to the grant of patta for the grama natham lands and hence, they are taken up together, heard and disposed of by this common order.

2. Heard all the learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioner and the learned State Government Pleader assisted by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. The facts leading to filing of these writ petitions are as follows:

WP.No.4936 of 2025:

(i) The properties in S.F.Nos.1380/17 (180 sq.meters) and 1380/27 (920 sq.meters), Thenkanikottai Village and Taluk, Krishnagiri District along with vast extent of other properties were owned by petitioner's grandfather. His grandfather constructed a house in a portion of the subject properties and the remaining portion was kept vacant. The petitioner's grandfather died leaving behind him four sons and three daughters.

(ii) There was a family arrangement entered into among the co-sharers vide partition deed dated 20.8.1951 registered as doc.No.733 of 1951 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Thenkanikottai, pursuant to which, the subject properties were allotted to (1) the petitioner's father - Mr.Subbiah, (2) his paternal uncle - Mr.Vasudevaiah and (3) one Mrs.Saradhammal - wife of his deceased paternal uncle - Mr.Ramachandraiah. Further, the said Mrs.Saradhammal was given only life interest and after her death, the subject properties would devolve around the petitioner's father and his paternal uncle. During the UDR proceedings, the subject properties were classified as grama natham and were subdivided. Thereby, the house portion was given S.No.1380/15 and the vacant lands were given S.Nos.1380/17 and 1380/27. The remaining properties that were owned by the petitioner's father, his paternal uncle and the widow of his paternal uncle were settled in favour of one Mr.V.N.Ramamurthi, who is none other than the son of the petitioner's paternal aunt.

(iii) Later, the petitioner applied for the grant of patta in respect of the subject properties. Based on that, a report was called for from the concerned Revenue Tahsildar, who also recommended for the grant of patta. However, the Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai-5, vide proceedings dated 12.2.2021, rejected the claim made by the petitioner.

(iv) Aggrieved by that, the petitioner filed W.P.No.20715 of 2024 before this Court and it was allowed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by order dated 31.7.2024 directing the concerned Revenue Tahsildar to pass orders within a period of three months. While dealing with the said writ petition, the learned Single Judge placed specific reliance upon the earlier orders passed by this Court with respect to the issuance of patta for grama natham lands. Thereafter, by the impugned order, the Revenue Tahsildar once again rejected the claim made by the petitioner on the ground that he had no power to grant patta for the grama natham lands beyond three cents. Challenging the same and for a consequential direction to the the third respondent to grant patta for the grama natham lands, W.P.No.4936 of 2025 has been filed.

WP.No.6015 of 2025 :

(v) The petitioner is residing in the property in survey No.1036 situated at No.449, Near Kadathur Bus Stand, Kadathur, Madathukulam Taluk, Tirupur District-642203 for over 30 years along with his children. He made a representation dated 24.12.2024 to the concerned Revenue Tahsilda

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top