PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA
Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.
1. This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961[Hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’] for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator by Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd.2[Hereinafter referred as ‘applicant’]
2. Facts: The Ministry of Home Affairs (Procurement Division)3[Hereinafter referred as ‘respondent’.] floated a single party tender on 02.02.2011 for supply of 31,756 Glock Pistols. The bid was confirmed in favour of the applicant and a Tender of Acceptance was issued by the respondent on 31.03.2011. Clause 64[“6. Performance Security Deposit- You will submit performance bond of 10% of value of contract i.e. US$ 13,29,093/- (US dollars thirteen lakh twenty nine thousand and ninety three only) in the shape of bank guarantee in the required Performa in favour of Joint Secretary (Police Modernisation), Ministry of Home affairs, Jaisalmer House, New Delhi within 30 days here of i.e. by 30.04.2011. The Performance guarantee will remain valid till two months after the expiry of warranty period, which will be 18 months from the date of acceptance stores at the consignee location. If necessary, firm on their own will hav
K.P.Chowdhry v. State of Madhya Pradesh. And Others (1966) 3 SCR 919 [Para 12] – Referred.
Mulamchand v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1968) 3 SCR 214 [Para 12] – Referred.
Secretary to Government Transport Department, Madras v. Munusamy Mudaliar
State of Assam and ors. v. Shri Kanak Chandra Dutta
International Authority of India v. K.D.Bali and Anr, 1988 (2) SCC 360; S.Rajan v. State of Kerala
TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engg. Projects Ltd.
Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. v. Raja Transport (P) Ltd.
Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals v. M/s. Indo-Swiss Synthetics Germ Manufacturing Co.Ltd.
Denel Propreitory Ltd. v. Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence
Voestalpine Schienen GmbH v. DMRC
Bipromasz Bipron Trading SA v. Bharat Electronics Ltd.
Bhikraj Jaipuria v. Union of India (1962) 2 SCR 880 [Para 12] – Referred.
Ace Pipeline Contract Pvt. Ltd. v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Puri v. Gangaram Chhapolia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.