SURYA KANT, DIPANKAR DATTA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary – Appellant
Versus
K. L. Rathi Steels Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. a split verdict requires addressing conflicting opinions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. review petitions stem from land acquisition disputes. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. arguments around maintainability shape review deliberations. (Para 20 , 21 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. review jurisdiction is constrained by established law. (Para 34 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 5. conclusion reflects on the implications of judicial review. (Para 118 , 121 , 126) |
JUDGMENT :
(A) PREFACE
(B) THE REFERENCE
(C) JUDICIAL TRAJECTORY
4. The 2013 Act was enforced with effect from 1st January, 2014. Soon thereafter, the interpretation of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act fell for consideration before this Court. A three-Judge Bench (Cor. Hon’ble R.M. Lodha, Hon’ble Madan B. Lokur and Hon’ble Kurian Joseph, JJ.) in Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki , (2014) 3 SCC 183 explained, in the light of section 31 of the 2013 Act what the expression “compensation has not been paid” occurring in section 24(2) meant. The verb “paid” in the same sub-section was also explained. Perhaps, since no argument was advanced, the Bench did not have the occasion to consider whether the conjunction “or” between the expressions “co
Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana
Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki
Indore Development Authority vs. Shailendra
Indore Development Authority vs. Shailendra
State of Haryana vs. G.D. Goenka Tourism Corporation Limited
Indore Development Authority vs. Shyam Verma
Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal
Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal
Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki
Board of Control for Cricket in India vs. Netaji Cricket Club
Haridas Das vs. Usha Rani Banik
Neelima Srivastava vs. State of U.P.
Union of India vs. Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad
Moran Mar Basselios Catholics vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
Lachhmi Narain Balu vs. Ghisa Bihari
Patel Naranbhai Jinabhai vs. Patel Gopaldas Venidas
Thadikulangara Pylee’s Son Pathrose vs. Ayyazhiveettil Lakshmi Amma’s son Kuttan
Sudananda Moral vs. Rakhal Sana
Ravella Krishnamurthy vs. Yarlagadda
Union of India vs. Mohd Nayyar Khalil
Nand Kishore Ahirwar vs. Haridas Parsedia
State of West Bengal vs. Kamal Sengupta
Subramanian Swamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Beghar Foundation vs. K.S. Puttaswamy
Raja Shatrunji vs. Mohd. Azmat Azim Khan
Jagmohan Singh vs. State of Punjab
S. Madhusudhan Reddy vs. V. Narayana Reddy
Vikramjit Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra
Shri Ram Sahu and Others vs. Vinod Kumar Rawat
Patel Narshi Thakershi vs. Pradyumansinghji Arjunsinghji
Padam Sen vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
My Palace Mutually Aided Co-operative Society vs. B. Mahesh and Others
Delhi Administration vs. Gurdip Singh Uban and Others
Supertech Ltd. vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association and Others
Meghmala vs. G. Narasimha Reddy
Delhi Development Authority vs. Maharaj Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.