Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. ABD AZIZ ABD SHUKUR @ ABDULLAH - High Court
"], ["PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. ABD AZIZ ABD SHUKUR @ ABDULLAH - High Court
"].PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. SHUHAIMY JOHRI - High Court
"].PP LWN. MOHD AZMI IBRAHIM & SATU LAGI - High Court
"].Kesalahan ini sering dibuktikan melalui laporan kerosakan dan nilai kerugian yang ditentukan secara fakta kes, dan hukuman boleh termasuk penjara dan sebatan ["
SARAVANAN MARIAPPAN LWN. PENDAKWA RAYA - High Court
"].Analisis dan Kesimpulan:
PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. ABD AZIZ ABD SHUKUR @ ABDULLAH - High Court
"].PP LWN. MOHD AZMI IBRAHIM & SATU LAGI - High Court
"].SARAVANAN MARIAPPAN LWN. PENDAKWA RAYA - High Court
"].PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. ABD AZIZ ABD SHUKUR @ ABDULLAH - High Court
"].References:- ["
PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. ABD AZIZ ABD SHUKUR @ ABDULLAH - High Court
"]- ["PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. ABD AZIZ ABD SHUKUR @ ABDULLAH - High Court
"]- [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRSU_2023_MLRSU_51)- ["PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. SHUHAIMY JOHRI - High Court
"]- ["SARAVANAN MARIAPPAN LWN. PENDAKWA RAYA - High Court
"]- ["PP LWN. MOHD AZMI IBRAHIM & SATU LAGI - High Court
"]
If you've landed here after searching , you're likely dealing with or curious about a charge involving property damage or . This section of the Malaysian Penal Code () addresses serious instances of that cause significant loss or damage. In this comprehensive guide, we'll break down the offence, penalties, notable cases, and how courts handle sentencing – especially when multiple convictions are involved. Note: This is general information based on legal precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
punishes whoever commits () and thereby causes loss or damage amounting to RM25 or upwards. generally involves intentional acts that destroy or diminish the value or utility of property, without lawful justification.
The penalty typically includes:- Imprisonment for up to 2 years, or- Fine, or- Both
.
This distinguishes it from , which covers with damage below RM25, carrying lighter penalties. Courts strictly assess whether the damage threshold is met based on presented facts
.
For example, in a recent case, the accused was charged under Seksyen 427 for damaging a front door lock, causing RM29.90 in loss. However, the court found the facts insufficient to sustain the charge under S427 and amended it to S426, imposing a RM1,000 fine
. The judgment stated: Mahkamah meminda pertuduhan kepada kerana fakta kes tidak mendedahkan kerugian yang mencukupi untuk Seksyen 427
.
Key elements to prove under S427:- Intentional act of .- Resulting damage or loss of RM25 or more.- Absence of lawful excuse
.
Malaysian courts interpret S427 judiciously, often scrutinizing the exact nature and extent of damage. In
, the prosecution alleged: Oleh yang demikain kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan dibawah s 427
. Despite the accused pleading guilty, the reviewing court exercised its power under to amend the charge, citing . This highlights that facts must squarely fit S427; otherwise, lesser charges apply
.
Another reference appears in older precedents linking to procedural aspects. For instance, discussions on ( with modern provisions) underscore procedural fairness in such trials
.
Courts also differentiate S427 from related offences. In armed robbery cases involving violence, charges under , 397, and 355 were upheld separately, but -like damage could intersect if proven
. The court there emphasized: severe penalties for public safety, with 7 years' jail and caning upheld
.
When an accused faces multiple convictions, including under S427, courts have discretion on whether sentences run or . (Cr.P.C.) – analogous in Malaysian context to provisions like – grants this flexibility 1991 0 Supreme(SC) 427.
Section 427 empowers courts to direct sentences for multiple offences to run or , based on case specifics. It's aimed at preventing undue sentence stacking while allowing judicial flexibility 1991 0 Supreme(SC) 427.
Key principles:- No rigid rule: Discretion exercised on sound principles, considering offence nature, offender background, and sentencing goals 1991 0 Supreme(SC) 427 1983 0 Supreme(Ker) 99.- Not for default imprisonment: Imprisonment for non-payment of fines isn't a 'sentence' under 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 436.- Case-specific: Concurrent for related/single transaction offences; consecutive for distinct/unrelated ones 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 449 2017 6 Supreme 47.
In 1983 0 Supreme(Ker) 99, courts stressed personalized sentencing: sentencing should be personalized and suited to the offender and the crime 1983 0 Supreme(Ker) 99. For S427 cases with multiples, leniency via concurrency may apply if from one incident, promoting judicial economy 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 449.
Conversely, for unrelated offences, consecutive terms reflect gravity: courts may decline concurrency 2017 6 Supreme 47.
Consider a scenario with multiple charges (e.g., damaging multiple properties in separate incidents). Courts weigh:- Single vs. multiple transactions: Concurrent if linked 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 449.- Offender profile: First-time vs. repeat.- Public interest: Deterrence for vandalism spikes.
Limitations:- Discretion not absolute; serious cases demand consecutives 2017 6 Supreme 47.- Exclusions: Fine defaults 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 436.
In sabotage contexts, related charges like (essential services sabotage) aren't always under special laws like , allowing standard S427 application if damage fits
. The court held: kesalahan sabotaj terhadap perkhidmatan air tidak tertakluk di bawah
.
.
: Amendment from S427 to S426.
: non-applicability.
: Procedural history.
: Related violent offences.
.
Understanding can help navigate charges effectively. Stay informed, but seek professional advice for personalized guidance. Share your thoughts below!
#Seksyen427, #KanunKeseksaan, #HukumMalaysia
Dapatan Dan Analisis Mahkamah Terhadap Isu Sama Ada Peruntukan Di Bawah SOSMA Terpakai Terhadap Kes Sabotaj Bagi Perkhidmatan Air Yang Dituduh Di Bawah Seksyen 124K Kanun Keseksaan Kanun Keseksaan khasnya Bab VI - Kesalahan Terhadap Negara, bermula daripada ss 121 hingga 130A seperti yang berikut: "JADUAL PERTAMA (Seksyen 3) p align ... Pertalian Antara SOSMA Dan Kanun Keseksaan [12] Di bawah Kanun Keseksaan#HL_END....
375 Kanun Keseksaan. ... Regina; [1955] 21 MLJ 13 dimana peruntukan seksyen 427(1) Straits Settlement CPC adalah in-pari materia dengan peruntukan seksyen 399 Kanun Prosedur Jenayah sekarang. ... Isa, nombor surat beranak H631454 yang berumur 13 tahun 4 bulan, dengan itu telah melakukan satu kesalahan dibawah seksyen 376 Kanun Keseksaan dan boleh dihukum dibawah peruntukan yang sama". ... Beliau hanya memberi penumpuan kepada isu sa....
375 Kanun Keseksaan. ... Regina; [1955] 21 MLJ 13 dimana peruntukan seksyen 427(1) Straits Settlement CPC adalah in-pari materia dengan peruntukan seksyen 399 Kanun Prosedur Jenayah sekarang. ... Isa, nombor surat beranak H631454 yang berumur 13 tahun 4 bulan, dengan itu telah melakukan satu kesalahan dibawah seksyen 376 Kanun Keseksaan dan boleh dihukum dibawah peruntukan yang sama". ... Beliau hanya memberi penumpuan kepada isu sa....
Maka, Tertuduh dituduh di bawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan . ... Sama Ada Terdapat Halangan Dalam KTJ Bagi Memerintahkan Bon Berkelakuan Baik Menurut Seksyen 294 KTJ Bagi Kesalahan Di Bawah Seksyen 427 Kanun Keseksaan [10] Seksyen 294(6) KTJ memperuntukkan seperti berikut: "6. ... Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan#HL_E....
Maka, Tertuduh dituduh di bawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan . ... Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan . ... Sama Ada Terdapat Halangan Dalam KTJ Bagi Memerintahkan Bon Berkelakuan Baik Menurut Seksyen 294 KTJ Bagi Kesalahan Di Bawah Seksyen 427 Kanun Keseksaan s 427 Kanun Keseksaan#HL_....
427 KANUN KESEKSAAN." ... OLEH YANG DEMIKIAN KAMU TELAH MELAKUKAN SUATU KESALAHAN YANG BOLEH DIHUKUM DI BAWAH SEKSYEN 323 KANUN KESEKSAAN." ... 506 KANUN KESEKSAAN." ... Manakala bagi kes nombor BK-83-195- 02/2023, hukuman yang telah dijatuhkan adalah penjara dua puluh (20) bulan dari tarikh tangkap, 20 Februari 2023 di bawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan dan yang terakhir bagi kes nombor BK-85-58-02/2023....
397 Kanun Keseksaan berkait kes no: 62-70-11-2012 dan juga pertuduhan di bawah Seksyen 395 Kanun Keseksaan berkait kes no: 62-71-11-2012 yang digabung dan dibicara bersama pertuduhan di bawah seksyen 355 Kanun Keseksaan berkait kes no: BA83-1489-11-2012. ... Dengan itu, kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah seksyen 395 Kanun Keseksaan ." ... Dengan itu, kamu telah melakukan suatu k....
427 Kanun Keseksaan ." ... OLEH YANG DEMIKIAN KAMU TELAH MELAKUKAN SUATU KESALAHAN YANG BOLEH DIHUKUM DI BAWAH SEKSYEN 323 Kanun Keseksaan ." ... 506 Kanun Keseksaan ." ... Kesan kemekan tersebut boleh dilihat di gambar kerosakan seperti di eksibit P7 bagi kes No BK-83-195-02/2023 bagi kesalahan di bawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan . ... Manakala bagi kes nombor BK-83-195- 02/2023, hukuman yang tela....
Seksyen 300(c) Kanun Keseksaan 5.1. ... Seksyen 300(d) Kanun Keseksaan 6.1. ... Seksyen 307 Kanun Keseksaan 10.1. ... 302 Kanun Keseksaan kepada satu pertuduhan di bawah Seksyen 304(a) Kanun Keseksaan . ... Bagi kes di hadapan Mahkamah ini Pendakwaan menggunakan Seksyen 300(c) Kanun Kesek....
Oleh yang demikain kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan dibawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan ." [2] Pada 12 Februari 2024 Tertuduh mengaku bersalah atas pertuduhan. ... [12] Mahkamah ini berpendapat dalam semakan ini pihak-pihak mungkin terlepas pandang apabila gagal menimbangkan fakta kes yang diberikan secara lisan tidak mendedahkan kesalahan dibawah s 427 Kanun Keseksaan [Kanun itu]. ... Selepas mendengar mitigasi peringanan hukuman dan hujahan pemberatan oleh TPR yang....
Thus, the question of adverse possession or its perfection are also not relevant. It is neither a Patta nor a document which conferred any right to the appellants. As per Mall Kanun of Rewa State Gomti prasad, appellants or any member of their family have not acquired any title or possession of the land. Although in the year 1942 respondent has gone in service since then his sister-in-law (widow of brother) was looking after all the affairs of it.
Jab File Rashtrapati Bhawan gai to Rashtrapati K. R. Narayanan ne atrikat Judge ke pad ke liye M. K. Mittal ka naam manjoor kar liya magar Goel ke naam ko thukra diya. Goel ke prati I.B. dwara kee gai tippani ko Arun Jaitley ne apmanjanak nirupit kiya. File men Arun Jaitley ne uneh imaandaar Judge likha. File vapas Kanun Mantralaya vapas bhej dee gai aur Arun Jaitley ne un ka bachav kiya.
Aap murkh hai, kanun kuchh nahi jante hai aur hakimi dikhate hai. Thereafter, he in expression of great rage, put off his shoes and hurled it at the Presiding Officer Sri A.K. This report is also reproduced: "In continuation of my confidential letter No. 26 dated 22.7.2003, I am to state that the Assistant Public Prosecutor Sri Suresh Prasad on being over ruled by the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa for putting irrelevant questions blurred the following expressions of abuse, "Aap jyada Kabilmat baniye, ham Aap ko didha denge.
This apart, in the present case the resolution of the Syndicate has stated that the deficiency has been condoned perma¬nently. In view of the aforesaid decision of this Court, the deficiency in qualification having been condoned the same is forgiven and the deficiency attached gets washed away. Because of all these, we are of the view that Shri Kanun¬go’s appointment as Lecturer was valid with effect from 8.8.19”.
Isliye is case men genuineness of document is challenged and this matter is to be decided. While stating the plaintiff's reliefs, the Court has given its own reason about the genuineness of the document. Aisi paristhiti men muddai duara dakhil kiya gaya kanun lagu hota hai. " The paragraph just quoted above admittedly refers to the plaintiff's document and I fail to understand as to wherefrom the Court got this impression that the plaintiff's document was under challenge, as a perusal of the impugned ORDER :, as a whole, does not whisper about it.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
