SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Karnataka Monthly Digest – February 2026 - 2026-03-09

Subject :

Karnataka Monthly Digest – February 2026

Supreme Today News Desk

Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 8051
Karnataka (2000)

PRAVEEN D @ MADHU @ MADDY C/O DEVANATH vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Subject: Criminal Law – Petition for Quashment

Keywords: quash, acquittal, insufficient evidence, prosecution, liberty, Judicial time, criminal conspiracy, independent witnesses, IPC, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act

The acquittal of co-accused due to insufficient evidence necessitates similar relief for the petitioner facing parallel charges.

Headnote:

The judgment examines the legality of proceedings in S.C. No. 1529/2021 initiated against the petitioner for serious criminal allegations under various sections of the IPC and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. The petitioner seeks relief on the basis that others charged with similar offenses were acquitted. The court finds that independent witness testimonies were lacking in support...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 8050

SRI NARENDRA GOPAL GOWDA A N vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Subject: Criminal Law – Preventive Detention

Keywords: preventive detention, public order, legal irregularities, quashing order, Goonda Act, wrongful detention, due process, judicial review, factual inaccuracy, rights of detenue

Preventive detention must link past conduct to an imminent threat; reliance on outdated or incorrect data violates legal principles.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas Act, 1985 - Preventive Detention - Detention order quashed due to lack of live link between past actions and current threats to public order - Reliance on factually incorrect data in grounds of detention rendered the order invalid. (Paras 3, 6, 14, 17) (B)...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 8046

B.K. Prema, B.K. Jyothi, B.K. Keshav Kiran vs N. Shivanand

Subject: Civil – Specific Performance

Keywords: specific performance, contract, lis pendens, evidence, purchaser, agreement, real estate, rights, limitation, decision

The court reaffirmed the doctrine of lis pendens in specific performance cases, establishing that subsequent purchasers with knowledge of prior agreements cannot claim independent rights.

Headnote:

(A) Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52 and 54 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Elements of lis pendens - Suit for specific performance of a sale agreement where one party claims subsequent purchase - Court affirms earlier decree—Defendant No.2 is bound by the doctrine of lis pendens and lacks bona fide purchaser status. (Paras 26-28) (B) Evidence - Standards of proof - The court must weigh ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7993

M/S. AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD. vs M/S. SAISANJ RETAIL PVT. LTD.

Subject: Civil – Commercial

Keywords: reopening case, witness recall, production of documents, reasonable cause, timely disclosure, commercial court, negligence, court procedures, evidence, legal principles

Timely disclosure of documents is essential in civil proceedings; failure to do so without reasonable cause can result in exclusion of evidence.

Headnote:

(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Sections 11, 18 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 11 Rule (3) and (5) - Plaintiff sought to recall a witness and produce documents after significant delay - Court noted that failure to produce documents at the time of filing the plaint bars their later introduction unless reasonable cause is demonstrated - Finding that plaintiff failed to establish reasonabl...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7989

SRI. V PRATHAP REDDY, SMT. V HEMALATHA, SMT. V. SAROJINI DEVI, SMT. A. RAJESHWARI, SRI. R. RAMANJANEYULU REDDY, SRI. G. PULLA REDDY, SMT. G MAHESHWARI, SMT. K SUJATHA, SRI. KONA VENKATA PRASAD REDDY, SRI KONA MAHEEDHAR REDDY, SRI. K CHANDRA MOHAN REDDY, SRI. T. SURESH KUMAR REDDY, SRI. B. VENUGOPAL REDDY, SRI. K. SREENIVAS REDDY vs SRI PAPANNA SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS, SRI. RAMAMURTHY, SRI. RAVI, SMT. PARVATHAMMA, SMT. MUNIYAMMA, SMT. RENUKA, MASTER MOHAN, SMT. KAVITHA, SRI VARUN, MS. CHERIKA, SRI GURU, MS. ARPITHA, M/S. FOYER CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., SRI. VISHWANATH KUMAR, SRI. VENKATACHALAPATHY, SMT. K PADMAVATHI, SMT. RAMSHA G, SMT. K ARCHANA, SMT. M.L. HAMSAVATHI, SMT. USHA

Subject: Civil – Contractual Disputes

Keywords: stamp duty, impounding, deficit, settlement agreement, memorandum of understanding, court order, reconsideration, legal clarity, submissions, petition

The trial court must provide clear findings regarding the relevant provisions of the Karnataka Stamp Act before impounding documents.

Headnote:

The petition challenges the trial court's order allowing a motion under Sections 33 and 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act regarding impounding of documents for alleged insufficient stamp duty. The appellants argued the documents were duly stamped; the court found lack of clarity in the trial court's reasoning concerning relevant stamp provisions. Consequently, the order was set aside for reconsiderati...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5884

SRI. BADRINATH LADDA vs SMT. D. VIJAYA

Subject: Criminal Law – Negotiable Instruments

Keywords: Cheque, Dishonour, Conviction, Acquittal, Condition, Debt, Negotiable Instruments Act, Presumption, Rebuttal, Evidence

The court established that a cheque issued under a condition of non-compliance does not create a legally recoverable debt, allowing for the presumption to be rebutted.

Headnote:

(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Dishonour of cheque - Accused was held liable despite asserting cheque issued under condition of supply of goods not met - Courts below convicted the accused, not appreciating the defence raised - Rebuttal of presumption related to debt established by evidence - Decision reversed; acquitted. (Paras 20, 21) (B) Legal Principles - Burden of proof ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7184

SRI. KIRAN BHARTIYA vs M.D. OMER

Subject: Civil Law – Negotiable Instruments

Keywords: promissory note, loan, testimony, credibility, evidence, appeal, dismissal, financial capacity, adverse inference, collusion

Personal testimony is essential in monetary claims; absence undermines credibility.

Headnote:

(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 96 - Promissory note - Suit for recovery of hand loan - Plaintiff alleges that he advanced a loan but did not enter witness box, relying instead on his General Power of Attorney holder’s testimony - Court finds the absence of the plaintiff’s personal testimony undermines the claim’s credibility - No documentation to establish the plaintiff's financial capab...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 1744

RAHUL GANDHI vs BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

Subject: Defamation – Criminal Procedure

Keywords: defamation, defendant, complainant, aggrieved person, criminal procedure, interim relief, evidence, advertisement, mens rea, political parties

Legal requirement for 'some person aggrieved' is essential in defamation cases; failure to meet this requirement renders proceedings invalid.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 499 and 500 - Defamation - Proceedings set aside against accused No.4 due to lack of sufficient evidence connecting them to the publication of a defamatory advertisement - Legal requirement of 'some person aggrieved' is critical for maintaining a defamation complaint, and its absence renders proceedings void. (Paras 15-36) (B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7850

STATE OF KARNATAKA vs RAMESHA @ SAKKARE

Subject: Criminal Law – Appeals

Keywords: Prosecution, Acquittal, Kidnapping, Rape, Evidence, Victim, Inconsistency, Credibility, Burden of Proof, Minor

The prosecution failed to prove the accusations of kidnapping and sexual offences beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the upholding of the trial court's acquittal.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 378(1) & (3) - POCSO Act, Sections 5(i) r/w 6 & 17 - Appeal by State against acquittal - The trial court found insufficient evidence to prove the offences of kidnapping and rape against the accused, leading to an acquittal. The denial of sexual contact by the victim and discrepancies in evidence were critical. (Paras 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 13) (B) Prosecution's bur...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7030

EXECUTIVE OFFICER MELUKOTE SRI CHELUVANARAYANASWAMY TEMPLE MELUKOTE TOWN PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571431 vs STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA VIDHAN SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001

Subject: Property Law – Land Rights

Keywords: fraud, occupancy rights, temple, Land Tribunal, legal heir, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, Hindu Religious Institutions, status quo, writ appeal, remand

Fraud vitiates all proceedings; lack of notice to a party renders tribunal orders unsustainable.

Headnote:

The Executive Officer of Melukote Temple challenges the validity of the Land Tribunal's 1976 order granting occupancy rights, invoking the Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997. The court found procedural violations and established that fraud vitiated the original proceedings. Therefore, the prior judgment was overturned, remanding the matter for reconsideration, with a ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 1396

SRI. C MUNIRAJU vs SRI. S N SUBBAREDDY ALIAS CHINNAKAYALAPALLI

Subject: Election Law – Corrupt Practices

Keywords: Election petition, Non-disclosure, Corrupt practice, Assets and liabilities, Representation of People Act, Scrutiny of nominations, Electoral integrity, Property tax dues, Election result, False declaration

Non-disclosure of material facts in election affidavits constitutes corrupt practice, affecting election results and undermining electoral integrity.

Headnote:

(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 80, 81, 100, 101, 123 - Election petition challenging the election of Respondent No.1 on grounds of non-disclosure of assets and liabilities in Form 26 Affidavit - Respondent No.1 failed to disclose business interests, agricultural land, and property tax dues, constituting corrupt practice - Non-disclosure materially affecting election result -...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5805

M/S CENTURY GALAXY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD vs THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT OFFICE

Subject: Property Law – Real Estate

Keywords: ownership, property, rights, allottees, association, declaration, injunction, possession, company law, construction

The court held that once possession is transferred to allottees under a property scheme, the developer cannot later claim they are mere licensees.

Headnote:

This case concerns the dispute over ownership rights in a property developed under a scheme by a private company. The plaintiffs contend ownership retained by them, contending no rightful title conveyed to flat allottees under company law. The trial court dismissed their suit. The court held that the plaintiffs, having transferred possession through share issuance without execution of sale deeds, ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 6944

SRI SUMIT TANDON vs SRI KRISHNA FABRICS

Subject: Criminal Law – Negotiable Instruments

Keywords: revision petitions, conviction, N.I. Act, compounding, payment, guidelines, cheque, respondent, offence, legal notice

The court established guidelines for compounding offences under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, emphasizing early resolution and payment structures.

Headnote:

The court examined issues under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, where the petitioner, representing accused no.1 Company, failed to pay amounts due for supplied goods, leading to convictions from trial to appellate courts. The court framed the questions surrounding the applicability of prior judgments in payment terms and the composition of offences. In light of previous rulings, the court ordered a m...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 6923

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH BASAVAPATNA POLICE STATION vs JAGADISHA NAIK J

Subject: Criminal Law – Acquittal Appeals

Keywords: acquittal, inconsistencies, evidence, victim, medical, POCSO, appeal, trial court, credibility, burden

The trial court's acquittal was upheld due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborating medical evidence.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 378(1) and (3) - POCSO Act - Section 4 - Appeal against acquittal - Acquittal of accused based on inconsistencies in victim's evidence and lack of medical substantiation - Court must ensure cogent evidence is present to reverse trial court decisions - Trial Court deemed to have properly acquitted based on contradictions in victim's testimony and medic...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 3401

SRI SREEKUMAR vs CANARA BANK

Subject: Civil Law – Contract Law

Keywords: writ petition, debt recovery, partnership, novation, guarantee agreements, liability, creditor, reconstitution, bank loan, obligations

Retiring partners are discharged from liability if the creditor acknowledges the reconstitution of the partnership and accepts the new partners in a loan agreement.

Headnote:

The petitioners challenged the DRAT's decision which upheld the DRT's ruling that the petitioners remained liable for a bank loan after their retirement from a partnership firm, despite the firm being reconstituted. The court examined whether the subsequent agreements constituted a novation releasing the petitioners from liability. The High Court concluded that the new agreements sufficed to disch...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5810

SMT. M.A. SHAHNAZ vs SRI. ANTHONY STEPHEN

Subject: Civil – Property Dispute

Keywords: title, possession, rectification deed, property transfer, dispossession, legal authority, evidence, appeal decision, decree confirmation, invalid claim

A rectification deed cannot create title where the original vendor lacked authority to convey property rights, reaffirming legal principles regarding property transfers.

Headnote:

(A) Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 7, 8, and 54 - Appellant's claim over property based on a sale deed executed by a vendor without title - The rectification deed cannot create title or revive rights extinguished by previous sale. (Paras 24, 26, and 28) (B) Appellate Review - A Court’s role in appeal is to assess if findings of lower courts are perverse or illegal; an attempt to introdu...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5831

SRI SACHIN NARAYAN vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

Subject: Civil Law – Property Law

Keywords: Writ Petition, Public Auction, Right to First Refusal, Tenant Rights, Eviction, Court Guidelines, Possession, Lease Expiry, Commercial Properties, Legal Procedures

Tenants have a Right to First Refusal in public auctions of commercial properties, which must be exercised within prescribed timelines.

Headnote:

The Court considered the guidelines issued for public auction of commercial properties and the rights of tenants in such auctions, noting that the petitioners sought to quash a notification due to their tenant status. The Court found that tenants may exercise their Right to First Refusal and that, upon failure to do so, possession must be surrendered within a specified period. The ruling establish...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5721

SRI MUHAMMED ZEESHAN vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Subject: Service Law – Administrative Justice

Keywords: transfer, premature, administrative tribunal, justice, writ, guidelines, Karnataka civil services, natural justice, quashed, reinstatement

Transfer orders must adhere to established guidelines and natural justice principles; premature transfers without due process are unsustainable.

Headnote:

The petition contests the transfer order, claiming it was premature and illegitimate according to the Transfer Guidelines. The court emphasized the lack of proper procedure concerning the transfer and concluded that the impugned orders did not comply with legal standards, emphasizing the principles of natural justice and the guidelines as laid out in the Karnataka Civil Services Rules. The court u...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 6844

MR. SHARATH RAJU S/O T RAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT MILLENNIUM HABITAT APARTMENT M-06, B-BLOCK, NEXT TO CMRIT ENGG COLLEGE, KUNDLAHALLI DODDANEKKUNDI BENGALURU - 560 037 vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, WHITEFIELD POLICE STATION REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001

Subject: Criminal Law – Matrimonial Disputes

Keywords: Quashing, 498A, Dowry Prohibition, Matrimonial disputes, Vague allegations, Prima facie evidence, Abuse of process, Legal caution, Inherent powers, Criminal proceedings

Courts must exercise caution against the misuse of Section 498A IPC by ensuring allegations are supported by prima facie evidence, particularly in matrimonial disputes.

Headnote:

The Court, under the inherent powers conferred by Section 482 of Cr.P.C, seeks to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioners charged under Section 498A R/w 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act due to lack of prima facie evidence and manifest abuse of process of law (Paragraph 10). The core issue was whether the allegations in the FIR were vague and unsupported by sp...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7804

SRI PRAKASH N MURTHY vs M/S GRAVITY PROPERTIES PVT LTD

Subject: Criminal Law – Negotiable Instruments Act

Keywords: Negligible Instruments Act, appeal, acquittal, victim, transfer, jurisdiction, complainant, court, provision, legal remedy

A complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is entitled to appeal against an acquittal judgment, recognized as a victim under criminal law.

Headnote:

This Court addressed the validity of appeals filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C., concerning acquittal judgments. The appellant was found entitled to appeal under the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Supreme Court clarified that a complainant can appeal as a victim, thus validating the appeals filed. The Court directed the transfer of appeals to the appropriate sessions ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 3384

T N JAGADEESH vs CHAIRMAN / DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THE DISTRICT CASTE AND INCOME VERIFICATION COMMITTEE

Subject: Caste Verification – Reservation Benefits

Keywords: Caste Certificate, Documentary Evidence, Identity Verification, Lingayat, Ganiga, Reservation, Cumulative Evidence, Judicial Precedent, Statutory Authority, Procedural Fairness

Legal identity of caste verified through cumulative documentary evidence, recognizing that overlap exists between broader religious identities and specific caste classifications, affirming procedural ....

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227 - Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, etc.) Act, 1990 - Caste verification - Petitioner's challenge to caste certificate of respondent No.3, who claimed to belong to Ganiga community under Category II-A - Court emphasized the significance of contemporaneous documents, particularly schoo...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 7805

SRI.D.LOKANATHAN S/O S.DORAI RAJU vs A FARNANDIS S/O ANANTHARA PIALLAI

Subject: Property Law – Title Disputes

Keywords: Power of Attorney, Sale Deed, Fraud, Evidence, Ownership, Dismissal, Verification, Wills, Legal Standing, Court Reasoning

Allegations of fraud in property transfers must be substantiated with specific, credible evidence; failing which claims may be dismissed.

Headnote:

This judgment examines the validity of a General Power of Attorney executed in 1987 and the subsequent Sale Deed. The plaintiffs claimed ownership of property through a Will but challenged documents as fraudulent. The court prevailed that the plaintiffs failed to prove the allegations of fraud or produce convincing evidence, corroborating the Trial Court's dismissal. The key issues were whether th...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 3383

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY BAGALAGUNTE POLICE STATION, BENGALURU vs SRI. RAGHUVEER

Subject: Criminal Law – Sexual Offences

Keywords: acquittal, evidence, consent, kidnapping, minor, sexual assault, proof, testimony, POCSO Act, JJ Act

The court affirmed that acquittal was proper, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence in sexual assault cases and the prosecution’s failure to prove kidnapping or consent under the specified l....

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 363, 366, 376 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Acquittal of accused - Appeals against acquittal of accused under IPC and POCSO - Lack of corroborative evidence led to acquittal; the evidence of the victim girl not supported by medical evidence - Case dismissed due to absence of proof regarding age and consent, aligning with the principles l...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 6891

M/S SKYLARK DEVELOPERS (A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM) vs M/S. AIR CRAFT EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

Subject: Civil – Procedural

Keywords: Writ Petition, Execution Proceedings, Impugned Order, Impleadment, Inquiry, Remitted, CPC, Judgment, Rival Contentions, Decree Holder

The court emphasizes the necessity of conducting an inquiry under Section 47 CPC concerning the rival contentions regarding impleadment of parties in execution proceedings.

Headnote:

This Writ Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to set aside the order of the XIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru dated 22.02.2025 in Ex. Petition No. 479/2023. The Court finds that the impugned order allows the impleadment of representatives in interest under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC, which in essence is under Section 47 CPC requiring an inquiry. Th...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5527

SMT. PADMAVATHI W/O LATE K.M RAMADAS vs SMT. BHAGYA

Subject: Property Law – Easements

Keywords: easement, prescription, limitation, public road, ownership, plaintiffs, defendants, appeal, declaration, court ruling

An easementary right by prescription cannot be claimed by a lessee without the true owner, and claims barred by limitation are unsustainable.

Headnote:

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration that Schedule 'B' property is a public road and the plaintiffs have acquired easementary rights. The Court noted relevant statutes, particularly emphasizing limitation under CPC, and the issue of proper ownership for easement claims. The Court found no evidence substantiating the claimed public road status and affirmed the trial court's...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 6728

SMT. ANJINAMMA D/O. LATE AJINAPPA, W/O. VENKATAPPA vs SRI NAGARAJ S/O. ANJANAPPA

Subject: Civil – Partition Suit

Keywords: partition, civil procedure, necessary parties, withdrawal, joint family property, jurisdiction, legal standing, equitable resolution

A partition suit must include all necessary parties, and withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh suit is permissible, protecting the rights of all involved.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Article 227 - Writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a partition suit - The trial court permitted withdrawal of the suit allowing the plaintiffs to file a fresh suit to include omitted properties and parties - It was emphasized that a partition suit remains pending until all properties are divided and possession is transferred. (Paras 6, 10, 11) (B) Partition Suit ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5521

SMT. ANNAPOORNA, TEJAS, SHREYAS vs SMT. NANJAMMA, SMT. PARVATHAMMA, SMT. LATHA, SMT. MANJULA

Subject: Civil Law – Property and Partition

Keywords: appeal, partition, settlement, compromise, civil judge, decree, possession, joint family, dispute resolution, amicable

Court recognized a mutual settlement among parties and recorded a decree reflecting the terms agreed upon during the appeal.

Headnote:

This case concerns Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the CPC against a judgment and decree concerning partition and possession delineated in O.S.No.1092/2007. The Court noted that parties reached an amicable settlement regarding the properties subject to the dispute, recorded as a compromise. The ruling highlights the compromise terms and consequent decree drawn in agreement with the...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 6661

DOMANIKA S/O SABASTIN vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Subject: Criminal Law – Quashing of Criminal Proceedings

Keywords: impersonation, quashing, FIR, cognizance, evidence, IPC, cheating, protest, conviction, criminal proceedings

Insufficient evidence for impersonation and fraud led to quashing criminal proceedings under IPC.

Headnote:

Statute Analysis: The petitioners sought to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 419, 420, 465 read with Section 34 of IPC, alleging false cognizance. Facts: The FIR indicated impersonation by petitioner No.1. The police filed a 'B' report stating insufficient evidence against the petitioners, while respondent No.2 challenged this with additional claims. Findings of Court: The court observed ...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5432

SRI M K NAGESH vs SRI RAMESH REDDY R

Subject: Civil – Interlocutory Appeals

Keywords: temporary injunction, prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable harm, judicial discretion, delay, equitable relief, dismissal, court order, legal principles

The court reaffirms that the grant of temporary injunctions requires established criteria including prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm; undue delay undermines claims for ur....

Headnote:

This appeal seeks to set aside the order dated 22.07.2025 issued by the Trial Court, dismissing the injunction application based on Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the CPC, demonstrating the parameters of granting temporary injunctions as established under judicial precedents. The Court analyzed Temporary Injunctions involving prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and judicial discr...


Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2026 5415

QUANTUM INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC vs M/S DURGA SHREE HEIGHTS PVT LTD

Subject: Civil – Writ Petition

Keywords: compromise, stay, amendment, procedure, legal reasoning, remittance, order, judgment, court review, arbitration

The failure to provide sufficient justification for stay orders leads to a lack of procedural fairness; amendments to pleadings are necessary for an adjudication process.

Headnote:

The petitioners sought to set aside the impugned orders dismissing their applications before the commercial court regarding the enforcement of a compromise order. The court found that the commercial court had failed to provide adequate reasoning for its decisions, particularly in granting a stay of proceedings without valid justification. However, it upheld the amendment application allowing for a...


Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top